Home > FreeHovind > Content > Discussion: Responding to mwolf
Responding to mwolf
160 Comments - 21863 Views
Submitted By doctorofscience on 10/03/06
FreeHovind, doctorofscience, Discussions 
This Discussion originally posted in the "FreeHovind" Group

Since our little pal Mikey seems to determined to just post the samefundie/creationist talking points over and over again (while ducking and dodging every time someone poses a direct question or challenge to him), I've decided to put together a list of the various claims he's made - along with a summary of how those claims are inaccurate or fallacious.
 
Rather than writing the same replies over and over again, from now on I'll just post a link/reference to the appropriate post in this thread. If there are any that I've missed, please post 'em. I'd been meaning to put together a list of creationist fallacies and lazy debate tactics, but this should serve the same purpose since Mikey uses pretty much all of them.
 
And here's an index with links to the individual posts, to make it even easier to refute Mikey's claims.
 
CLAIM 1
"Atheism is evil because it's responsible for the holocaust and various other attrocities." 
 
CLAIM 2
"All atheists are communists/socialists/Marxists." 
 
CLAIM 3
"Atheism is a religion because atheists BELIEVE there is no God."
 
CLAIM 4
"By not speaking out against the killing of Christians in China, or DrWorm's post that right-wing Christians should be put in camps, atheists condone both."
 
CLAIM 5
"our observation is needed  to make the wave functions collapse into matter," therefore "the'big bang' [couldn't] produce matter without our [God's] observation".
 
CLAIM 6
"everything may not be natural and God is plausable" [sic]
 
CLAIM 7
"The Bible is historically-accurate because of the dead sea scrolls/passages in the Bible that have been verified by historians or archaeologists"
 
CLAIM 8
"Creationism is valid because of discoveries made by scientists who also happened to be creationists."
 
CLAIM 9
"My philosophy is superior because I only believe, but you think you know everything."

» Reply to Discussion (Too Many Replies for Fancy Display) 160 Replies
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/06 - 23:38 GMT
"Atheism is evil because it's responsible for the holocaust and various other attrocities." 
 
Not only is this claim an example of the guilt by association fallacy, it also demonstrates a failure to understand the difference between correlation and cause. None of the attrocities Mikey has mentioned were committed in the *name of* atheism, nor has he been able to show that was A cause, let alone THE primary cause of any of his examples.
 
It should also be noted that comparisons to Hitler or the Nazis (reductio ad Hitlerum) are widely considered to be one of the lazies, cheapest, and most desperate of debate tactics. To the point where, in some forums, anyone who uses that comparison immediately/automatically loses the debate (see also "Godwin's Law").
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/06 - 23:44 GMT
"All atheists are communists/socialists/Marxists."
 
Incredibly easy to debunk, there are plenty of examples to the contrary - people like Ayn Rand and Robert A. Heinlein. It also seems to be nothing more than a slightly-less offensive version of the "reductio ad Hitlerum" tactic, as he tries to make the same claim regarding Stalin and atheism.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/06 - 23:45 GMT
"Atheism is a religion because atheists BELIEVE there is no God."
 
This claim demonstrates a misunderstanding of what atheism really is. In English, the prefix "a" can mean either "opposed to" or "abstaining from" - while theism means "a belief in God or gods." So, literally, "atheism" means "abstension from, or opposition to, belief in God or gods."
 
The "null hypothesis" should also be noted - it states that claims which are unaccompanied by evidence (such as claims about the existence of a supernatural being) should be assumed to be false until evidence is provided. That's not some "atheist dogma," that's a basic aspect of intellectual rigor (which is the foundation of the scientific method).
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/06 - 23:45 GMT
"By not speaking out against the killing of Christians in China, or DrWorm's post that right-wing Christians should be put in camps, atheists condone both."
 
This claim is both absurd and offensive - essentially: if you don't explicitly speak out about something, then you condone it. Most people here, even ronnie, are smart enough to realize that DrWorm was trolling (and probably doesn't sincerely believe what he wrote) - and knew that condemning his post would be taking it far more seriously than it deserved.
 
As for China, there are numerous groups and individuals who advocate against the human rights abuses committed in China - including the killing of Christians (while Mike seems to only focus on abuses committed against his "own people"). Both claims are ridiculous and are based on assumptions that Mikey hasn't provided any evidence for.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/06 - 23:47 GMT
(direct quote this time, this one's too bizarre to paraphrase) "our observation is needed  to make the wave functions collapse into matter," therefore "the'big bang' [couldn't] produce matter without our [God's] observation".
 
This seems to be a half-baked "theory" cobbled together from partially-understood principles like the "Observer Effect" and theoretical thought-experiments (like Schrödinger's cat). I'm certainly not a physicist, but I can't find any legitimate source supporting the claim that our/God's observation is required for the formation of matter; it also doesn't resemble any explanation I've ever read for the origin of matter.
 
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/06 - 23:48 GMT
"everything may not be natural and God is plausable" [sic]
 
This is an example of the "God of the gaps" argument - the classic example being "we don't know what caused the Big Bang, so maybe God diddit." The argument is fallacious because it mistakes possibility for likeliehood - just about ANYTHING is possible from a philosophical standpoint, but that doesn't mean it's likely. At that point, God is no more likely an explanation than Zeus or Allah or the Easter Bunny - they're all equally possible.
 
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/06 - 23:49 GMT
"The Bible is historically-accurate because of the dead sea scrolls/passages in the Bible that have been verified by historians or archaeologists"
 
That claim is a huge leap of logic (or faith?) - a few accounts from the Bible have been verified, to the degree possible, but only a small number. Certainly not enough to support the conclusion that the Bible is historically-accurate in its entirety (no reputable historian or archaeologist would agree with that claim).
 
In the same way, he fact that ancient manuscripts have been found (E.g. the Dead Sea scrolls) doesn't prove the Bible's historical accuracy either. That would be the same as claiming that early copies of the Homeric epics (and the fact that there is some historical evidence for events they describe, like the Trojan War) proves that the Iliad and the Odyssey are historically-accurate, including all the stuff about the Greek gods.
10 hours - 500v
Posted 2010/03/07 - 0:15 GMT
A month or so ago, someone posted a blog on the number of times Hitler referred to Darwin & evolution and compared to the number of times he referred to God. He never referred to Darwin in Mein Kempf, but made references to God (37 times), the Almighty, and Creator.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 0:20 GMT
ooo, i get my own article? :0
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 0:24 GMT
hehe, alright. number 3 was not possibly true. But I had to laugh when I saw it again.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 0:26 GMT
I stand by the rest of them. Atheism is the root of the, I don't blame the people.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 0:44 GMT
Hey folks. I said something about the Bible being historic and these bozos pounced, just like the other guy they scared away like bullies in a school yard. So I started stating the truth as I saw them of their philosophy and the shit hit the fan. As a matter of fact I angered them into this post. When I called them on something that I knew as evil, they didn't back down.
 
They accused me of being stupid, crazy, uneducated, moron, etc. insult after insult after insult. relentless, these guys are on a mission.
 
One of them wants to meet with me to say something to my face. We seemed to be confused about want he wants to say. I told him he was playing games. And that he knew what I was talking about. And I will meet with him if he wants to say something to my face. Whether it be, "omfg, you people are nuts". or "we should put all of ringwing Christians in camps". Either are fighting words as far as I'm concerned.
 
as soon as they pointed out my blanket statements about Atheists, I back right down cause they were right on that point. My real anger is what Atheism does to them as evident in thier texts everywhere.
 
And if he takes me up on this, he deserves retribution. I will do my best to make him regret his hatred.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 0:54 GMT
Oh, and another thing. I was accused of my screen name not being my real name. I am Michael wolf. You guys want my address? who are you people behind proven inaccurate screen names? I am not afraid of saying what is in my heart and mind. Everyone that knows me, knows me to be honest, brite, athletic, polite, outspoken, camera shy, and takes no shit. That's who I am. I don't like how many atheists hide what they really think. I think their philosophy demands it. Could be a fact, could be wrong, but many agree with me. Doesn't mean it's true, but has some merit if looking at the last 50 years of many people complaining about the very thing I am talking about. So go ahead and insult me some more fellas. Make my points for me time and time again.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 1:47 GMT
"ooo, i get my own article? :0"
 
the word is thread.
and we had to do the same for ronnie,
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 1:49 GMT
"hehe, alright. number 3 was not possibly true. But I had to laugh when I saw it again."
 
and that didn't bother you when you where writing it? it DIDN"T occur to you? dispite the fact that this has (presumibly) been explained to you numerous tiems already?
 
or did you mean sci was the lier there?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 1:50 GMT
"I stand by the rest of them. Atheism is the root of the, I don't blame the people."
 
yet you completely and uttelry fail to find any evidence to link that "philosophy" to the crimes. or in other words, you have yet to demonstrate causation.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
10 hours - 500v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 1:56 GMT
Michael Wolf,
 
Expect to get dirty when you throw mud.
 
Either get educated or be ignorant.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 2:00 GMT
"Oh, and another thing. I was accused of my screen name not being my real name."
 
you ought to REREAD that "accusation". i clearly said is presumed it was an pseudonym. as that is not uncommon in fora.
 
"You guys want my address?"
why would we? and what good would that do?
 
"who are you people behind proven inaccurate screen names?"
 
i've already explained my screen name. it came down that you misunderstood it remember.
 
"I am not afraid of saying what is in my heart and mind."
 
then you have serious psychological issues and i reccommend you seek  counseling IMMIDIATELY.
 
"Everyone that knows me, knows me to be honest, brite, athletic, polite, outspoken, camera shy, and takes no shit."
 
well you don't seem awefully "bright" when you spew such ignorance. and you strawman quite a lot, so there goes the honesty. and well...polite isn't exactly the term i would use for your "behavious" here.
but what use is this ego stroking?
 
"That's who I am. I don't like how many atheists hide what they really think."
 
what we think, or what YOU think WE think?
i get the sneaky feeling it is the latter.
 
"I think their philosophy demands it."
 
you have already demonstrated you know shit about our philosophy and you are unwilling to learn anything about it from us.
 
"Could be a fact, could be wrong, but many agree with me."
 
only in your own cirlce. most moderate christians (thedude being more right imo) will see the batshit in yoru words and react accordingly.
 
'Doesn't mean it's true, but has some merit if looking at the last 50 years of many people complaining about the very thing I am talking about."
 
and yet in the countries with larger percentages of atheists, we don't seem to have these problems. WHY is it that it is only the rightwing fundementalist christians and the fundementalist muslims speaking out agaisnt this "godlessness"?
 
"So go ahead and insult me some more fellas."
 
unfortunately to most thrid parties you post history isn't goign to help you martyrdom.
 
"Make my points for me time and time again."
 
oooh COME ON!
this is to easy.
fine..here it comes.

"because you are incapable of making them yourself?"
 
happy now?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 2:12 GMT
"just like the other guy they scared away like bullies in a school yard."
 
the increadibly irony here is that you are (trying) to be the bully. and failing miserably.
 
"So I started stating the truth as I saw them of their philosophy and the shit hit the fan."
 
 
so we shouldn't adress obvious bigotry, unfounded hate, and astonishing ignorance?
 
' As a matter of fact I angered them into this post."yet i am calm an composed, despite beign a little rattled by your audacity to fling the holocause dernier insult...me having stood on the graves of the jews and russians in bergen belsen that is....
 
"When I called them on something that I knew as evil, they didn't back down."
 
???
 
"They accused me of being stupid, crazy, uneducated, moron, etc. insult after insult after insult."
 
well you ARE asking for it. and you certainyl deserve half of them. even by the most lenient standards you are acting like an incredible prick.
 
"relentless,"
 
it's not like you're going at it any easier.
 
"One of them wants to meet with me to say something to my face."
 
i said skype, and is wasn't to insult you, it was to (oooh) educate you on you horrible ignorance of evolution, atheism and history in general.
 
"We seemed to be confused about want he wants to say. I told him he was playing games. And that he knew what I was talking about. And"
 
no, you said this (you tossed the confidentiality out the door here)
"
Why are you pming me? I know where your coming from. Just becaus your an Atheist, doesn't mean your evil, you all say that.  It was no joke writing about putting people in camps. Please respond to my posts only man, else I'll think your a stalker.

 I'm forty eight, you need to talk to someone of your age. I've been where you are and back again.

 

Thanks, uh... man that don't give his name. Mike"
 
"And I will meet with him if he wants to say something to my face."
 
yet you declined at first because you "didn't have skype"...
 
"Either are fighting words as far as I'm concerned."
 
and neither were waht i was going to say to you.
if you ever get around to skyping , you'll be suprised.
 
"My real anger is what Atheism does to them as evident in thier texts everywhere."
 
ooh and it's not that the hatefull bigotry instilled in you by your "sources" is to blame for that anger right?
 
"And if he takes me up on this, he deserves retribution."
 
fortunately i'm not the vengefull type. i think jezus had a point there with the other cheek when it comes to asinine violence. of course that won't stop me from correctign you.
 
"I will do my best to make him regret his hatred."
 
hatred of what? ignorance?
it is only in your mind that i hate fundies. most of the time i just feel sorry for em and i feel like i want to help them...say isn't that...help your fellow man...'love your neighbour"?
(funny how i feel more chrisitan then you act atm)
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 2:13 GMT
cmon man, it was more like a figure of speech, i didn't really think it true. But if you are going to call me on it, I'll back off and say you are right. Now what, you want retribution for me? What of the lies told to me, that haven't been admitted to? No retribution for me. Nothing you said was  improper?  why am I held to a standard you guys fall far short of?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 2:26 GMT
More insults. See what Atheism has done for him? He is a real open minded person huh folks.
 
I am polite. I am in take no shit mode. I am polite til then.
 
you put it out there to hear, who are you conning man. That is exactly what you were impliying. Depends on what is, is. Same thing.
 
Hmm, no actual name calling this time. But the insults are slipping in trying to go under the radar cause they are looking pretty ignorant by now.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 2:43 GMT
"More insults. See what Atheism has done for him? He is a real open minded person huh folks."
 
i MIGHT be handy you quote. that way we can al enjoy you martyrdom to it's fullest.
 
"I am polite. I am in take no shit mode. I am polite til then."
 
ooooh, riiight.
then you have a very braod idea of what polite is.
 
"you put it out there to hear, who are you conning man. That is exactly what you were impliying. Depends on what is, is. Same thing."
 
quote plz, because i have no idea what this is referring to.
 
"Hmm, no actual name calling this time. But the insults are slipping in trying to go under the radar cause they are looking pretty ignorant by now."
 
oh don't worry, i wil insult you. if i deem you deserve it. like when you bastardize atheism, put words in our mouths, ect, and then NOT correct these claims and statements.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 2:47 GMT
"Nothing you said was  improper?"
 
oh yes sure. there were a few things that were improper. bu they where adressed to evne more improper things, thing you should know are really hatefull and stupid to say.
 
"why am I held to a standard you guys fall far short of?"
 
i thin it's because we AREN'T claiming that we put christians in cams, orgnaizing an ungodly cruisade, focusing solely on atheist persocution and not makign the sort of leaps in reassning you are making. like how you bastardize quantum mechanics.
 
"cmon man, it was more like a figure of speech, i didn't really think it true."
 
what exactly? quote because i ahve no idea what youa re backing down of now.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 5:06 GMT
HAD to do the same for Ronnie? Is this another of the we got to do something about these people Post? lol You really think we are a problem don't you comrad? cmon, be honest. Here we go again. Your showing your true colors again man.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 5:14 GMT
The hate came from you folks. Go ahead and read some more posts. Is this what you Atheist. do to try and divert the fact of your hostilty all over the net Don't want none, don't give none.
 
Atheism is responsible for 100,000,000 murders in 100 years. You got no business talking about evil. All it does is kill. Like your soul for instance. Christians are saints compared to Atheism. The philosophy of satan according to the Bible. And you never said a word of Atheist murders. It don't bother you at all does it? Your true colors again.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 5:21 GMT
I'm Throwing back Atheist. And I see you have that mean spirit same as the rest of the Atheists in these posts. You guys can save all the work and just have one of you post. Because you are saying exactly the same things like parrots repeatong what your teachers taught you. Cmon! give it to me you foul mouthed child. show your true spirit! Let me have all your fury. I understand, you are so so so angry, that you just gotta show me who you really are like the rest. You like Marx too, huh? Hey, I could call you the Marx brothers!!! lol
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 5:35 GMT
No, people tell me I am polite supergenius. They must not know me as well as a supermind like yours.
 
You never told me your IQ superbrain. Christianity was basterdized and I am straightening it out. But you had to lie to try to avoid the light catching you hiding your agreement with evil. I know, you don't know what I am talking about again. Seems to me, you don't understand anything I am talking about. Or else you wouldn't insult everything I say.
 
Not a one of you has conceded any point on any post. What's that? Liars saying anything to attack the god they hate. And when we speak out against it, the blame turns to us? Keep it coming genius man calling names like a child with a false nickname. Are you guys paid to do this all day? I am off work. business is slow for me. How can you have days worth of writing and answering all posts. Like you have the time as if it's your job. Please speak up if this is just a hobby you waste your time on? Don't make sense. I smell a rat.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 8:54 GMT
Guilty by association? yea. Not a falacy. Same world view=Same conclusions. All those names socialist, progressive, liberal, Atheist. communist.
 
It's all still communists that keep changing their names and telling us we're stupid to not know the difference. I know what each used to mean. but if commies highjack the names to hide behind, they begin to make changes and giving their new name they hide behind a bad name, and highjack another name to hide behind.
 
But make no mistake. The communist template is being followed to a t by people calling themselves progressive now, seems to be the new name they think is clean. Or at least too old that they can reuse it from way back. You educated comrads know when I'm talking about, right? In ten years, there will ba another name, as "progressive", will have been ruined by then and the communists will need a new trojan horse. People should read the radical son by david horowitz. It only scratches the surface.
 
Communists are trying to slowly replace our history with a picture they want people to see rather than give the testimony of what people of the time said. You see Communists say our ancestors are a bunch of liars, including our ancestors in the Bible. And yet, these people aren't using testimony, they tells stories like it's fact, just like they do in all aspects of our society. If we changed what the witnesses say, then how can our future people trust all the changes? When does the chaging stop? The only way to be most accurate is not to change what we don't know for sure, or else we are frauds and history will be a fraud. Thank the jews for being so dedicated to making so many as to not leave any doubt that it is as it was originally written and in it has our eternal destiny and it is dismissed like an old peice of gum
 
You can't trust anything they say. their history is a story with an agenda. Imagine them back in the stone age(right after the flood when there was only newly growing vegatation, you know when we think Noah got off the boat), Where were the Communists to call us liars? The only reason there are Atheist is to deny our ancestors' testimony of our creator. All other religions are man's changing of the original to create the history they wanted, not the way the original testimony of the Bible. As far as any honest human is concerned, instead of spending an unbelievable amount of resources calling the original historians liars. Maybe we could have figured out what God meant by "the past is the past, what is, and what will be, has already been. I think this is what the quatum paradox is all about. but no science money there. Who would you believe? The people who were there? Or the ones who are only here because they were there. In other words, if the the torah were never written, then God is not here for the Atheists to deny. They're whole existance is to deny that hisory book.
Tell me that's a falacy! lol
 
as for the magic in the Bible. If the electron can ignore laws in our natural world and our view of time beyond our comprehension, who are you to say a creator could not?
 
 
you folks do your associating and we'll do ours. But we exist because of that book, because if it wasn't for that book, everything would be completely different. Being an American, I can't possibly think I would have it better than I do. I think the most evil man would have changed the world long ago. And there would have been no protests allowed.
 
No matter how much you guys squirm. You owe your existance to that book, why do you hate it so much? You got an earlier one? Nope, just
your opinion that your denial is legit. Now I know why you guys are cutting funding for digging. lol An irony or coincedence? they said there is no need anymore. The money spent for digging is working against their cause. They are only here to deny the Bible.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 9:53 GMT
"Is this another of the we got to do something about these people Post?"
 
look at his post history. if that doesn't bother you, then there is somehtign wrong.
i've never seen so much quotemning in my life....well short of watching hovind.
 
"lol You really think we are a problem don't you comrad?"
 
willfull ignorance and dilberate deciet are problems yes.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 9:56 GMT
" Atheism is responsible for 100,000,000 murders in 100 years."
 
and we go on with the false assertions...classic
 
"| All it does is kill. Like your soul for instance."
 
which we have how? because your "good book" said so rigth?
 
"Christians are saints compared to Atheism."
 
aah....no
have you watched bible camp?
 
"And you never said a word of Atheist murders. It don't bother you at all does it? Your true colors again."
 
i wonder if he realises how offensive he is? probably not.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 10:03 GMT
 
"No, people tell me I am polite supergenius."
 
[aaaaaaaah, how i love strokign my ego...mm it feels so good...]
 
"You never told me your IQ superbrain"
 
150+ my parents wouldn't let em know the exact number because they were afraid i would flaunt it around.
 
but i think it's more liek 140 nowadays. but i already siad that and IQ tests is NOT authoretative.
 
"But you had to lie to try to avoid the light catching you hiding your agreement with evil."
 
cabal, CABAL!

"Seems to me, you don't understand anything I am talking about."
 
it is because i so crisply understand it that i mock it so much. anything to motivate you to a little self reflection.
 
"Not a one of you has conceded any point on any post."
 
you have yet to make one.
 
all you do is posts fllacious statments and then not bakc them up.
 
" Keep it coming genius man calling names like a child with a false nickname."
 
...apparently you think the internet is safe.
i'd much rather keep my pseudonym.
 
"I am off work. business is slow for me."
 
not making enough money on the internet mr easymoney4ever?
 
postign pattern. nuff siad.
 
"Please speak up if this is just a hobby you waste your time on?"
 
didn't we already?
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 10:12 GMT
"Guilty by association? yea. Not a falacy."
 
fine that you demonstrate you are incapable of reasoning.
 
"You see Communists say our ancestors are a bunch of liars, including our ancestors in the Bible."
 
no, communism spoke out agaisnt organised religion controllign the people.
 
"you can't trust anything they say. their history is a story with an agenda."
 
...CABAL CABAL!
 
thi paranoia is almsot sickening.
 
'Imagine them back in the stone age(right after the flood when there was only newly growing vegatation,"
 
you actually think there was a global flood?
HOLY SHIT! are you really that batshit?
 
"The people who were there?"
 
this earth is much oldenr then we are.
 
" if the the torah were never written, then God is not here for the Atheists to deny."
 
there would ahve been pletny othe rgods, like zeus, krishna. dont worry about that.

"Tell me that's a falacy!"
 
humanity is older then 6000 years.
you lose.
 
"If the electron can ignore laws in our natural world and our view of time beyond our comprehension, who are you to say a creator could not?"
 
who is to say he did?
 
"You owe your existance to that book, why do you hate it so much?"
 
that is one BIG ego...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
9 hours - 765v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 15:09 GMT
I would like to take a number 2 right about now.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 15:50 GMT
Mind telling exactly where those killings where? and who did it and maybe something to support the claim that they did it in the name of atheism?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 16:10 GMT
"It's all still communists that keep changing their names and telling us we're stupid to not know the difference. I know what each used to mean. but if commies highjack the names to hide behind, they begin to make changes and giving their new name they hide behind a bad name, and highjack another name to hide behind."
- This statement made my day. Mike, a question, did you teleport here from the 50s or what? You seem to have the McCarthyism propaganda indoctrinated.

Basically everyone who doesn't have the same "values" and thoughts about the world is communists? And they are the sole reason for all pain and suffering in the world.
 
You wanna add some more insane accusations to them as well? Like communists is the reason why the twin towers fell. :O

"as for the magic in the Bible. If the electron can ignore laws in our natural world and our view of time beyond our comprehension, who are you to say a creator could not?"
- Seriously? When have electrons ignored laws in our natural world? Why wouldn't something be natural if we couldnt understand it? I mean was lightning gods wrath when we didnt knew it was electricity?
Who are you to say that there is a creator without any evidence at all. Who are you to say that the easter bunny could not?
Who are you to say that i didn't do it?


» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/08 - 22:43 GMT
ok..i had a look on his youtube site.. and lo and behold. who is there in the friends list?
your our very own thunderf00t.
meaning mike is could surely be aware of the fallacious reasonign he's putting out with his posts. and he knows they might have already been adressed in depth.
HELL he even subscribed to TA and he should understand what atheists actually think for the most part (sicne TA isn't really promoting the atheist cabal).
of course...we also have WTTW...which probalby means we are in for a LOT of ecology fails.
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/09 - 14:05 GMT
HAD to do the same for Ronnie? Is this another of the we got to do something about these people Post?
 
Wow, you're really starting to grasp at straws, aren't you?
 
lol 
 
...is still not punctuation.
 
You really think we are a problem don't you comrad? cmon, be honest. Here we go again. Your showing your true colors again man.
 
Still can't debate honestly, so you try to put words in peoples' mouths so you have a strawman to rail against. Pretty pathetic, Mikey.
 
Oh and I notice that you haven't responded to even a SINGLE specific point that I posted in refutation of your claims. Should we apply ronnie's reasoning and assume that you concede all of those points?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 1:19 GMT
ooo, i get my own article? :0
 
Yup. Be happy it's here and not on Encyclopedia Dramatica
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 1:52 GMT
The hate came from you folks. Go ahead and read some more posts.
 
How about you take your own advice and re-read some of your own posts? You came in here with rhetorical guns blazing, pretty much from the first post. I'd say that the responses from myself and 325 are examples of "responding in kind" - but I don't think anything we've posted has even approached some of the reprehensible statements you've made.
 
Atheism is responsible for 100,000,000 murders in 100 years. You got no business talking about evil. All it does is kill. Like your soul for instance. Christians are saints compared to Atheism. The philosophy of satan according to the Bible. And you never said a word of Atheist murders. It don't bother you at all does it? Your true colors again.
 
You're repeating the same fallacious in a thread where that same argument is debunked in the FIRST post? Sweet merciful crap, do you not have ANY shame whatsoever?
 
And to think - I was actually considering writing a "fair enough/maybe I was too harsh" post after reading a few posts where you actually seemed reasonable and contrite. Then I read the paragraph above.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 1:55 GMT
Mind telling exactly where those killings where?
 
Yes, he probably does mind :)
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 2:03 GMT
I stand by the rest of them. Atheism is the root of the, I don't blame the people.
 
I spelled out your claims & presented counter-arguments one at a time - and you STILL can't defend your claims with anything better than "I'm right because I say so"?
 
You are living proof of the saying "it's impossible to win a debate against an opponent who is unencumbered by respect for facts or honesty."
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 2:22 GMT
Hey folks. I said something about the Bible being historic and these bozos pounced, just like the other guy they scared away like bullies in a school yard. So I started stating the truth as I saw them of their philosophy and the shit hit the fan. As a matter of fact I angered them into this post. When I called them on something that I knew as evil, they didn't back down.
 
Or, in reality, you fell for a painfully-obvious troll post - then you jumped to the absurd conclusion that we agreed with the post because we didn't explicitly condemn it. So you started flinging around the bullshit that I've already debunked in the first posts of this thread.
 
They accused me of being stupid, crazy, uneducated, moron, etc. insult after insult after insult. relentless, these guys are on a mission.
 
Who are you talking to? I don't think there's a lurker majority here to sympathize with your attempts to play the victim. The evidence of your prejudice, fanaticism, and frankly profound stupidity is on full view in just about every post you've made here.
 
One of them wants to meet with me to say something to my face. We seemed to be confused about want he wants to say. I told him he was playing games. And that he knew what I was talking about. And I will meet with him if he wants to say something to my face. Whether it be, "omfg, you people are nuts". or "we should put all of ringwing Christians in camps". Either are fighting words as far as I'm concerned.
 
Translation: you were unable to tell the difference between the TITLE of a thread, and the BODY OF A POST. Then you tried to play the Internet Tough Guy and make thinly-veiled physical threats over your misunderstanding. And now you're backpedaling because you got called on your empty threat.
 
as soon as they pointed out my blanket statements about Atheists, I back right down cause they were right on that point.
 
...then you went right back into spewing your "Atheism is EVAL!" BS again.
 
And if he takes me up on this, he deserves retribution. I will do my best to make him regret his hatred.
 
Way to undermine yourself. But hey - if you're dumb enough to buy a 1st class plane ticket & book me hotel accommodations (remember, 4-star or better), I'll see you there.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 2:53 GMT
I'm Throwing back Atheist.
 
Bull. Shit.
 
At BEST, you might be able to justify taking an angry stance towards DrWorm. But you went way beyond that, almost immediately, by making sweeping, offensive statements about atheism in general.
 
Oh, and by the way - "atheism" STILL isn't a proper noun, you don't have to capitalize it. It just makes you look illiterate.
 
I could call you the Marx brothers!!!
 
Sure, but only if I can be Groucho.
 
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 12:52 GMT
I am Michael wolf. You guys want my address? 
 
Not particularly.
 
who are you people behind proven inaccurate screen names? 
 
What, you mean don't think that "Sciborg" is my legal name? A brilliant deduction.
 
But no, most of us here have more sense than to post personally-identifiable information in a forum where some of the participants are clearly unbalanced.
 
I don't like how many atheists hide what they really think. I think their philosophy demands it. Could be a fact, could be wrong,
 
Right on the second try. If you want to know my philosophical beliefs, nothing is stopping you from asking. Although you would probably ignore that information anyway, since it wouldn't reinforce your existing prejudices. 
 
but many agree with me. Doesn't mean it's true, but has some merit if looking at the last 50 years of many people complaining about the very thing I am talking about.
 
That's inane - you could use the same line of reasoning to justify eating cow manure. Billions of flies eat cow shit, after all, so it must have some merit. Right?
 
So go ahead and insult me some more fellas.
 
Don't mind if I do, Chuckles.
 
Make my points for me time and time again.
 
Just because you can't make your own points effectively, don't expect us to do it for you.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 13:08 GMT
More insults. See what Atheism has done for him? He is a real open minded person huh folks.
 
Whereas you're so open minded that I can practically feel the breeze from here (apologies to Groucho Marx).
 
I am polite. I am in take no shit mode. 
 
Yes, I think we're all aware that you can dish it out but you can't take it. Your "waaaaaaaah, the big mean atheists hurt my delicate widdle feewings" whining has established that beyond any question.
 
you put it out there to hear, who are you conning man. That is exactly what you were impliying. Depends on what is, is. Same thing.
 
Uh.... what? And what does that translate to in English?
 
Hmm, no actual name calling this time. But the insults are slipping in trying to go under the radar cause they are looking pretty ignorant by now.
 
Complaining about being insulted and then calling those people ignorant in the same sentence?
 
On Usenet, we used call that an auto-flame: attempting to insult someone else, and inadvertently insulting yourself in the process (something that you're a real master of).
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 13:41 GMT
No, people tell me I am polite supergenius. They must not know me as well as a supermind like yours.
 
Translation: "My mom says I'm cool!"
 
You never told me your IQ superbrain.
 
Probably because it was an obvious attempt to deflect from (or compensate for) the fact that your "arguments" don't stand on their own.
 
Seems to me, you don't understand anything I am talking about.
 
Guess what? Neither do you.
 
Or else you wouldn't insult everything I say.
 
Insults are all you've earned - as a Christian, I would have thought you would be more familiar with the concept of "reaping what you sow."
 
Of course, you do seem to be following the standard tactic of creationists (and those with Narcissistic Personality Disorder): act like a total asshat, then try to play the victim when people respond in kind.
 
Not a one of you has conceded any point on any post.
 
In the time you've posted here, I can't remember you making even ONE valid point. And it doesn't help that you consistently fail to support the claims you post.
 
And when we speak out against it, the blame turns to us? 
 
Because what you've spoken out against are nothing but your own delusional fantasies.
 
Are you guys paid to do this all day?
 
Believe it or not, there are actually some of us who have jobs that involve the use of computers.
 
I am off work
 
What a shock! And here I was, assuming that you were a brain surgeon or a rocket scientist.
 
How can you have days worth of writing and answering all posts. 
 
It's only possible thanks to a wonderful new idea called "touch typing" - maybe you've heard of it?
 
Please speak up if this is just a hobby you waste your time on? Don't make sense. I smell a rat.
 
Okay, you found us out. I admit, the secret global New World Order Marxist/Atheist/Humanoid-reptilian-alien pays a team of people, working in shifts, to post here. Yep, that's right - you and ronnie (brilliant tacticians that you both are) truly are that much a threat to our nefarious plans for world domination.
 
Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go stroke a cat while turning slowly in a large chair and twirling my mustache evily.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 16:12 GMT
actually, I didn't mean it litterally man. But since someone commented on it, I didn't argue. I conceded, but you want to turn it around to rub my nose in something, you are showing your true colors again. But shows how desparate you are to make any point you can. You are here to attack. I am here to defend. Am I wrong? After all, I am only responding to the immature evil I have seen from people here with Atheist views. You have no reason to be at this site but to bash. I see this venom you think is intellect, runs deep in these posts. I will read and respond whenever I can. most of us don't make money to post comments.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 16:19 GMT
Then why do you act like the average foul mouthed teen? maybe your philosophy causes you to look not as smart as you are. But you are one mean mother. I won't make any more points that you concider misinformation until the bashing stops. Until then, I will focus on the philosophical soundness of your behaviors. Have you ever admitted anything in your life? Or have you been using that IQ to get away with things. lol Philosophy is the soul of a man's brain.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 16:43 GMT
You see, the Bible came first. It is our history. You can't make things up and call it fact, just to disagree with it. It is the standard, not the atheism trying to refute it. And since it is impossible to refute it empirically like you said. Then why go to something we are guessing at. My history book says there was a flood of global proportions. You are guessing there was not. And the people who taught you it was fact, knew better. Mt st helen is showing that. My book says man and dinos lived together. You are guessing they did not. My book says yesterday, today, and tomorrow, have already been? Higher dimentions we could not possibly comprehend let alone act like we know enough to deny it.
 
There is not one scientist of any honesty that can possitively say I am wrong for a fact. But you guys will come in here, and push your opinion off as fact.
 
And then start the insults. It's a pattern. Go ahead, read the posts.
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 19:18 GMT
"I conceded,"
 
and you have a lot more of that to do, startign with the title of the origin of species.
 
"but you want to turn it around to rub my nose in something, you are showing your true colors again."
 
you aren't done with correcting your false claims yet, so untill then, no sympathy.
 
"But shows how desparate you are to make any point you can."
 
so desperate you actually had to conced on one? even with you "impecable" reasoning skills?
 
"You are here to attack."
 
says the man who cane out al guns blazing.
funy idiocy that's want to be taken serious provoces us.
because we actually care about reality.
 
"I am here to defend."
 
you sure as hell didn't start on that tone, and neither are you picking it.
or you seem to think "the best defense is a good offense" also applies to debates as well as fights.
 
"I am only responding to the immature evil I have seen from people here with Atheist views."
and so you respond in "kind" ?
 
"You have no reason to be at this site but to bash."
 
correctign blatant falsehood is ALWAYS a reason.
 
"I see this venom you think is intellect, runs deep in these post"
 
i'd much rather call it wit in sci's case. he tpyes in sucha  way hthat it reminds me of "a short history of nearly everything" or "the soddit".
 
"most of us don't make money to post comments."
 
and neither do we.
 
 
 
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 19:29 GMT
"Then why do you act like the average foul mouthed teen?"
 
 
HAHAHA..
no sir, the average foul mouthed teen would have slung faggot, moron, shitface and the usual "NANANANANA" round.
 
they wouldn't have actually taken the time to add any substance, much less make reccomendation, OR invite to civili dialogue. btw that offer is still open.
 
"maybe your philosophy causes you to look not as smart as you are."
 
my atheism barely has anything to do with my inteligence. i could have had an IQ of 100 and still not fallen for the painfully obvious fallacies.
my intellligence only speeded up the speed at wich i was able to graps the concepts.
 
"I won't make any more points that you concider misinformation until the bashing stops."
 
so w8? we continue to "bash you" and you'll stop posting blatant hate and dishonesty?
you really want those martyr points don't you?
 
" I will focus on the philosophical soundness of your behaviors."
 
which would be "much more severe" then the phychological soundness of your paranioa rigth?
 
"Have you ever admitted anything in your life?"
 
i'm heterosexual. am a bit to trusworthy, to shy to directly come forward with my feelings, i'm mean (as in economic) and i have a natural "facepalm" urge any time i meet someone who tried to do logical backflips. (as a result i cannot watch corny humor without flincing...).
that personal enough for you?
 
" Or have you been using that IQ to get away with things."
 
why that would be such a waste of my mind...and i hate wastign things...
i'd much rather choose to challange it.
 
"Philosophy is the soul of a man's brain."
 
no, that is not the definition...and probalby not a good metaphor either.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 19:41 GMT
"You see, the Bible came first."
 
cave painting, archeology, fossils, china and DNA say otherwise.
 
"It is our history."
 
and yet it makes no mention of australia, OTHER religions, (liek hinduism, or zoroastracism) or let say.....atoms (and don't fling around the "atom transaltion")
 
"You can't make things up and call it fact, just to disagree with it."
no it's the FACTS that dissagrew with what has been made up.
like genesis.
 
"It is the standard, not the atheism trying to refute it"
 
no reality is standard.
not what we write about it.
we might be able to depict it's generalness, but that's about af far as it gets. (units are jsut things we make up to quantify the world around us and to decribe the ralations ships between matter).
 
" And since it is impossible to refute it empirically like you said."
 
refute what exactly?
 
"My history book says there was a flood of global proportions."
 
and the very earht on which that books claims that flood occurs said that it didn't happen. so what are you gonna argue with? strate or your book written by an person who didn't even know that the eart was layered?
 
" You are guessing there was not."

BS. do not spit in the faces of geologists.
 
"And the people who taught you it was fact, knew better."
 
know i'm pretty sure my geography teacher has more expertiese to say somethign about the strata then you have....unless you can show me your degree in geology that is..
 
"Mt st helen is showing that."
what a rapid local deposition of VOLCANIC ash?
 
"My book says man and dinos lived together. You are guessing they did not."
 
HAHAHA....you really we would have been snacks rigth? we are horribly il equiped (even with our intelligence) to take on the likes of raptors, or big ass T rex.
btw, we also aren't guessing. the strata indicate it...and so does the writtenn history btw.
 
"y book says yesterday, today, and tomorrow, have already been? Higher dimentions we could not possibly comprehend let alone act like we know enough to deny it."
 
 
and here we have a window into your reasoing.
[believe ANYTHING, untill it's proven false!]
so i take it you believe in that invisable gnome on my shoulder too? or that pc's are actually makde of copkies and run on imp blood?
 
"There is not one scientist of any honesty that can possitively say I am wrong for a fact."
 
true, scientists do NOT argue with facts, the do however agrue with your bastardisation of what science is and how it works and what scientific literates ACTUALLY SAY.
 
sci and i already explained that in science, NOTHING is absolutely certain. every theory and hypothesis is falsefiable...
 
of course you must still have a reason to form an hypothesis first (evidence)...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 21:06 GMT
Guilty by association? yea. Not a falacy.
 
Sorry, but yes it is - especially when it's used as an "ad hominem" fallacy, as you're fond of doing.
 
"Guilt by association can sometimes also be a type of ad hominem fallacy, if the argument attacks a person because of the similarity between the views of someone making an argument and other proponents of the argument."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt_by_association#Guilt_by_association_as_an_ad_hominem_fallacy
 
Same world view=Same conclusions. All those names socialist, progressive, liberal, Atheist. communist.
 
Right, and we'll just take your word for that?
 
It's all still communists that keep changing their names and telling us we're stupid to not know the difference. 
 
Oh don't worry, I only think you're an idiot because of the profound, staggering level of stupidity you display in nearly every post.
 
I know what each used to mean.
 
Clearly you don't, if you believe that "liberal" and "socialist" mean the same thing.
 
The communist template is being followed to a t by people calling themselves progressive now
 
I'll be sure to mention that the next time I speak with someone who votes for the Progressive Conservative Party.
 
People should read the radical son by david horowitz. It only scratches the surface.
 
In other words, vague tinfoil hat ramblings from a politically and religiously-motivated ideologue.
 
Communists are trying to slowly [...] 
 
*Yawn* Sorry, it looks like your unsubstantiated ravings literally bored me to sleep. What were you saying?
 
Imagine them back in the stone age(right after the flood when there was only newly growing vegatation, you know when we think Noah got off the boat), Where were the Communists to call us liars?
 
Uh.... I'm no historian, but I'm pretty sure that Communism wasn't around 6,000 years ago.
 
All other religions are man's changing of the original to create the history they wanted, not the way the original testimony of the Bible. 
 
Are you even aware that there were religions that pre-dated Christianity? You might as well consider that rhetorical question, since you'll just dodge it anyway.
 
Who would you believe? The people who were there?
 
Sorry, but some of us aren't gullible enough to blindly take an account at face value. Especially when it's an unverified account of things that supposedly happened thousands of years ago.
 
if the the torah were never written, then God is not here for the Atheists to deny. They're whole existance is to deny that hisory book.
 
For the 20th or 30th time, you really don't understand what atheism is. If the Torah were never written, then another religion would have most likely filled the same role as Judeo-Christianity. And if there were no other religions, then everyone would be an atheist automatically/by default.
 
Tell me that's a falacy! lol
 
No lol, it's just lol stupid lol.
 
LOLZOMGWTFBBQ!
 
as for the magic in the Bible. If the electron can ignore laws in our natural world and our view of time beyond our comprehension, who are you to say a creator could not?
 
Once again: "possible" does not mean "likely."
 
Oh, and it looks like you managed to completely miss the point of the double-slit experiment. It doesn't demonstrate that electrons "ignore laws in our natural world" - what it does demonstrate is that Newtonian and Einsteinian physics don't tell the whole story.
 
No matter how much you guys squirm. You owe your existance to that book, why do you hate it so much?
 
Why do you assume we hate it? It may be hard for you to believe, but it's possible to disagree with something without hating it.
 
You got an earlier one? Nope, just your opinion that your denial is legit.
 
Yes, why trust reason, evidence, and all of those silly "atheistic" notions (like the idea that effects arise from anything other than magical causes, "lol" as you would say)? Who needs any of that when you have... a really old book (whoo!).
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 23:26 GMT
broad and sweeping was part of the post, part of the bashing. what about your other posts? Who do you think you are conning? Read your own words all over the forum. I would call it broad and sweeping being broad and sweeping. lol
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/10 - 23:41 GMT
Wow, investigating me? never ending responses? low and behold? They act like bullys, when they get shown the bullys they are. They actually go and search for things they can try to assassinate your character with. What is the next step here loving comrad? Do something about me? I think you would kill me if you could get away with it. What is your name? where do you live? You are the one hiding something aren't you? hehe Yeeaa! You have not shown any good qualities as a human in any of your posts. and don't back up anything by giving your name so maybe you can be looked into. But that is what you do , right? Put your name on your accusations or keep them to your hiding self, brother!. Your name is false, but you just hear a story you like and that's your science.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 1:14 GMT
who is thuderfoot anyway man?
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 2:12 GMT
Dr bob beck. I was looking for a way to cure the 100s of flee bite looking dots on my daughters legs. She was told by the doctor that it was psoriasis. He gave her antibiotics. no help. She went to another doctor, he gave her other pills. no change. He then put her on steroids. nothing. She was told there was nothing else to do and she would have it all her life.
 
At home that night, my daughter was crying that her life was ruined and could never show her legs again. My, younger son laughed at her and said hey Jenn, why don't you ask dad to fix it. He says he can find anything on the internet. He was mocking me. I said yea Jenn let me look. and both my sons laughed at me.
 
I found colloidal silver. I ordered the right kind. (the whole colloid) or deionized. She began taking it. The third day she said dad? they are not red anymore the look lighter. I said they looked the same to me. she said no way dad, they are lighter I know. By the 5th day we all saw them literly disappearing. Well, now everyone was driinking my 200 bucks a gallon stuff. We ran out. after one week they began coming back. I read a way to make your own. ionic type. I went out and got the hardware to make the device and was successful first time(internet):).
 
She began drinking it and they began disappearing again. There are people out there screaming ionic doesn't work. I know better now. But they know and I am the uneducated idiot if you know what I mean. But it worked. when I forgot to make it. They didn't come back. So it seems she needed it for 3 months to keep them away.
 
Now check this out. She trys to get into the Air Force and in her physical the doctor told her she could not join the Air Force because she has psoriasis. She said she doesn't have it anymore and the doctor said that's impossible. She said "my dad cured me of it with colloidal silver. Doctor said no he didn't, there is no cure. And that colloidal silver is "dangerous". He is speaking of a skin conditon when ionic silver is over used, called argyria. Blue tint to skin. How the term "Blue bloods" came about. But no other documentation of other side effects. Silver was the only antibiotic used before penicillin. And all you hear of silver in the mainstream (Atheistic) medicine is how bad is is and to stay away from it. really.
 
Then I read some more and found out that 88,000 people a year die directly from reactions to antibiotics. but silver is dangerous.
 
She did get a waiver for the army for the same thing, but they let her in despite her supposed condition.
 
Now I am supposed trust the ones that know? My kids can't believe I could do what I did and prove every know it all doctor, liars or fools. little old me.
 
Then I found dr Don Patton, saying the same thing Dr bob beck was saying. And the Atheist post that were on becks vids are on Pattons vids. What would you people think if you were me. Then I found Kent Hovind. I saw him making these same type of people that make these posts look like con men. Same comments as colloidal silver too. then I found dr barry setterfield and the same attacks were being launched at him.
 
Then I found ian Juby and the same pattern emerged. Some of these men are doing real science and real experiments. They are called liars, but I am sure they believe what they say. Every aspect of our society is infested with this we know so shut up science people. And they don't know. They lie to close minds not open them. Proof is here with these offspring of the we are the truth crowd. That does everything to hide truth. Their classes are there to make them Atheist first. education second. These teachers openly laugh at Christians and encourage their students to laugh by not teaching it's wrong. How would you know man? You were indotrinated. You can't see the forest from the trees. I can. Couldn't when i was like you.
 
Now, if I can literally prove real doctors wrong from my chair in thirty minutes. Why should I listen to the children taught by supposed all knowing doctor types? When they only know what they were taught is fact. It almost never is. But these kids don't know and are the ones primed for control.
 
I don't think these are evil people, yet. It is their philosophy that is dangerous. It makes them feel superior and don't doubt their souces 1 ioda. Shame.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 2:28 GMT
all I do is research, on one thing or another. that's it. I do nothing but learn. The good, the bad, and the ugly. I don't know the names of sources as there are 100s. Even college sites I surf has real learning in it. And college isn't all bad. But the culture has another agenda. I know it. as much as you folks think you know. But I am satified that all the deception will come to light as time marches on, that web that has been weaved, is becoming tangled with each grain of sand that disappears to advance time and reveal why and how the web was woven. And anyone talking it then will be laughed at for being Dogmatic. Mark my words. Anyone want to bet? How's that socialism working for you in Europe? lol From what I hear, it ain't good. I remember last year Europe said we were going down here in the USA. Tables have turned. Europe, stop your path before you die economically. You killed incentive and have more people poor because of it. And they will get poorer until you admit capitalism is the only way man can be rich and free. Those who want to anyway.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 2:46 GMT
And, i have to deal with 3 or more of the different persons, spouting the same thing. Just like you were taught. And if you are at different schools, case closed. 
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 6:14 GMT
"Most major sciences came from creationist researchers."
 
This is the reverse of guilt by association - honour by association. Most of the scientific discoveries made by creationists were made well before Darwin was ever born, by people who didn't know of any alternative to creationism.
 
Honour by association is just as fallacious as guilt by association - all that creationists can show is correlation, not cause. In other words, Isaac Newton's discoveries were not made because of his religious beliefs.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 15:17 GMT
"I think you would kill me if you could get away with it."
 
..wtf...
you really should be popping your paranoia meds now.
 
"You have not shown any good qualities as a human in any of your posts. and don't back up anything by giving your name so maybe you can be looked into."
 
ehm..i already gave you my real first name, i already told you what country i lvie in and i ALREADY invited you toa  CIVIL discussion. and that offer is STILL open.
and how are you suprised when you give us your youtube account?
 
"Your name is false, but you just hear a story you like and that's your science."
 
if you mean to say history books tell stories...wel dam.
you obviously hate everything that isn't telling it "your way".
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 15:18 GMT
"who is thuderfoot anyway man?"
 
he';s in your friends list...FFS man don't you even know who you invite or accept as a friend on youtbe?
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 15:35 GMT
"I found colloidal silver."
 
shit, so THAT"S where you got your entire "genetics" crap from.
 
but i would like to have seen the doctors own evaluation. to be sure of something.
also perhpas you hadn't thought of it goign itno remission itself? you know how your body has an immune system and all and how somethings are only triggered by certain conditions.
like lets say....Psoriasis guttate?
 
"I know better now. But they know and I am the uneducated idiot if you know what I mean."
 
go and test it on a LARGER sample of people before you claim it's actually the silver.
 
" And that colloidal silver is "dangerous"."
 
tell me. did your daughter at any time turn a slight tinge of blue while taking the silver?
 
" How the term "Blue bloods" came about."
 
as in royal blood? because there is a much easier explination then collodial silver for that figure of speech.
 
"Silver was the only antibiotic used before penicillin."yes and
 
unfortunetely it's side effects are irreverable. whereas biological antibiotics are largley biodegradable.
 
". And all you hear of silver in the mainstream (Atheistic) medicine is how bad is is and to stay away from it. really."
 
well yes. there are better alternatives out there, argyria is permenant. there is a buildup of metals in tissue (never a good thing). and that the effects of collodial silver have yet to be varified in large scale studies.
 
so yes, why shouldn't they warn you?
 
"Then I read some more and found out that 88,000 people a year die directly from reactions to antibiotics. but silver is dangerous."
 
compare that to the amount of people using antibiotics, vs people who use collodial silver. also i will like to remind you that this collodial silver will probably also kill of you gut flora...also never a good thing.
 
"She did get a waiver for the army for the same thing, but they let her in despite her supposed condition."
 
well i guess driving a tank is different then flighing a fighter...
unless she's in the maintenence devision.
 
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 15:35 GMT
you are so slimey. I am once again responding to Atheist attacks on how creationism kills scientific advance. I am just saying if that were true science wouldn't be rich with creationists all through it's advance. Again, just responding to an attacks you people always make and will now deny it, cause your philosophy doesn't teach you any better.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 15:43 GMT
"I do nothing but learn."
 
yet you know 0 about evolution and atheism outside of your preconcieved demonisations...how very odd.
 
" I don't know the names of sources as there are 100s."
 
that sounds suspicious...even i am still able to recount some of the books and site i get info from.
 
". Even college sites I surf has real learning in it"
 
only an intorduction at best...well unless you skip to the research papers..if you want coprehensive knowledge i suggest you buy collage books.
 
"But the culture has another agenda. I know it."
 
oh ya....you just feel it in your gut don't you?
 
"How's that socialism working for you in Europe?"
 
pretty good.
http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/cijfers/default.htm
still at 5.6 unemployment her ein NL
 
"lol From what I hear, it ain't good."
 
perhaps because you watch fox news?
 
"Tables have turned."
 
so you're out of the deperession already?
 
"You killed incentive and have more people poor because of it."
 
and yet the wealthgap is a LOT smaller...
 
"And they will get poorer until you admit capitalism is the only way man can be rich and free."
 
point is we don''t all need to be filthy rich to be happy.
and you also seem to forget that most countires ARE capitalist her ein the EU. and that a social democracy can still have a very good capitalistic economy.
(NL is mainly a trade and service nation)
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 15:44 GMT
I disagree. creationists today are the same way. They just have enemies that didn't exist in newton's day. Hell you guys would have not even let that nut newton in your universities. He  would be called an idiot by you geniuses here. There would be implication that he ought to be put away where he can't hurt anyone. Who are you conning. Get off of Newton's stick, he is ours. lol as a matter of fact science is ours. Cause you guys seem to already know, so science left you along time ago. Just because you hide behind it, doesn't make you safe from the reality of your hostilty toward your fellow man.
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 15:46 GMT
"I am once again responding to Atheist attacks on how creationism kills scientific advance."
 
unfortunately you seem to forget THAT THESE PEOPLE KEPT THEIR DOCTRINES OUT OF THEIR RESEARCH.
unlike what the current creationists are trying to do.
 
"I am just saying if that were true science wouldn't be rich with creationists all through it's advance."
 
and prior to darwin, creationism was the default.
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 15:50 GMT
"Hell you guys would have not even let that nut newton in your universities."
 
...if he can do the research, why wouldn't we?
the real question is...would he have been a creationists had he been alive today?
 
"Get off of Newton's stick, he is ours."
 
pity YOU CANNOT ASK HIM YOURSELF.
 
"lol as a matter of fact science is ours."
 
the go back to the darages when it all learnign was truly christianity's.
 
" so science left you along time ago."
 
and yet we are being trained to be competent practitioners of it in our relevent fields of study.
 
", doesn't make you safe from the reality of your hostilty toward your fellow man."
 
there are more people then fundementalist christians out there.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 16:04 GMT
"But I am satified that all the deception will come to light as time marches on, that web that has been weaved, is becoming tangled with each grain of sand that disappears to advance time and reveal why and how the web was woven. "
- So time will do what you failed? Showing that evolution is wrong that is.
How convinient.

"How's that socialism working for you in Europe? lol From what I hear, it ain't good."
- From who? Rush limbaugh? What you've heard is not necessarily reality.
From what i expericene It's good and i think some of my fellow europeans can confirm that.

"Europe, stop your path before you die economically. You killed incentive and have more people poor because of it."
- You're right we should abolish high income taxes so the wealthy can get more money instead of raising the economy and trade of other european countries!


In case you didnt see that sarcasm, that was really ironic.

"And they will get poorer until you admit capitalism is the only way man can be rich and free. Those who want to anyway."
- Actually we've got a high-income lower and middle class in my country, much due to the welfare system and free education. If i would have been born in the states i wouldn't get any health insurance (due to sickness at birth) and I would probably not be able to study since my family didnt have much money. From a family of fishermen in many generations back to an academic family in a few generations.
From this document (http://www.health.gov.au/internet/nhhrc/publishing.nsf/Content/135-interim/$FILE/135%20-%20Submission%20-%20Childrens%20Hospitals%20Australasia%20%28Attachment%20C%29.pdf):
"The consistent growth of the welfare state led to Swedes achieving unprecedented levels of social mobility and quality of life - to this day Sweden consistently ranks at the top of league tables for health, literacy and Human Development - far ahead of some much wealthier countries (for example the United States)."

This is what the CIA factbook had to say:
"Aided by peace and neutrality for the whole of the 20th century, Sweden has achieved an enviable standard of living under a mixed system of high-tech capitalism and extensive welfare benefits. It has a modern distribution system, excellent internal and external communications, and a skilled labor force."

namely the best of both capitalism and socialism. You get it mwolf?

3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 16:31 GMT
you are so slimey.
 
Awwww, Mikey doesn't like it when people point out the intellectual dishonesty of his arguments. Boo hoo.
 
I am once again responding to Atheist attacks on how creationism kills scientific advance.
 
Still desperately trying to play the victim, I see. Too bad that 5 minutes reading through your posting history is more than enough to torpedo that idea.
 
I am just saying if that were true science wouldn't be rich with creationists all through it's advance.
 
In terms of the influence on their discoveries, the fact that those scientists were creationists had about as much relevance as their hair colour.
 
And, of course, there's the obvious question of "what have creationists done for us lately?" You know, in the last 150 or so.
 
Again, just responding to an attacks you people always make and will now deny it, cause your philosophy doesn't teach you any better.
 
Mikey, your desperation is showing again. Maybe you should just skip ahead a few weeks in the standard creationist cycle - you know, make some lame excuse for leaving, then tuck your tail between your legs and run away.
 
Or are you going to have a proper meltdown first, bigdog and ronnie-style? Can't wait!
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 17:17 GMT
I disagree. creationists today are the same way.
 
Okay, name all of the reputable/published creationist scientists today - bonus points if you can actually name any that are young-Earth creationists.
 
Or hell, I'll make it easy for you: name even a SINGLE one. Waiting...
 
(And no, ID mouthpieces like Michael Behe and William Dembski don't count - they are very careful not to describe themselves as creationists... for some reason).
 
They just have enemies that didn't exist in newton's day. Hell you guys would have not even let that nut newton in your universities. He  would be called an idiot by you geniuses here. 
 
The funny thing is that, in reality, most of the attacks on Newton during his lifetime were made by Christians, on religious grounds - they believed that Newton's ideas of a naturalistic/mechanistic universe were "blasphemous." Fortunately, the Christian authorities didn't have enough power to suppress Newton the way they did with Gallileo.
 
Also, it's highly unlikely that Newton would have remained a creationist if he had ever had the opportunity to read Darwin's work. He had more than enough intelligence to see the merit of Darwin's ideas - and he already accepted naturalistic explanations (it's no coincidence that the title of his main work was "Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy").
 
There would be implication that he ought to be put away where he can't hurt anyone. Who are you conning. Get off of Newton's stick, he is ours.  lol as a matter of fact science is ours.
 
Yes, creationists certainly are fond of trying to lay claim to prestigious figures like Newton and Einstein - in the hopes that your pseudo-scientific beliefs will gain prestige by association. And, unsurprisingly, it's almost always attempted with people who are no longer around to defend themselves against those claims.
 
That's the first time I've seen a creationist attempt to lay claim to science in general, though. Are you trying out the "befuddle them with bullshit" tactic now?
 
Cause you guys seem to already know, so science left you along time ago. Just because you hide behind it, doesn't make you safe from the reality of your hostilty toward your fellow man.
 
Hey, wait a minute - an entire post with no mention of Hitler OR Marx?
 
Who are you and what have you done with Mikey?!?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 17:19 GMT
I stand by the rest of them.
 
No you don't - if you stood by them, you would back them up with something more substantial than comparing people to Hitler.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 21:47 GMT
broad and sweeping was part of the post, part of the bashing.
 
And then, without any evidence whatsoever, you just blindly assumed that DrWorm someone speaks for all atheists everywhere. Brilliant.
 
what about your other posts? 
 
Such as...?
 
Who do you think you are conning?
 
Sorry, Mikey, but I'm not the one with a website that needs to specifically state it's not an MLM scam in the FAQ. I'm sure that fills consumers with confidence, by the way.
 
Read your own words all over the forum. I would call it broad and sweeping being broad and sweeping. lol
 
Of course you would call it that (lol). I don't mind, though - most people should only need to read one or two of your posts before it becomes obvious that you don't have any idea what you're talking about. lol
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 21:56 GMT
And, i have to deal with 3 or more of the different persons, spouting the same thing. Just like you were taught. And if you are at different schools, case closed. 
 
Oh, do tell - what "case" would that be? This oughta be good.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 22:02 GMT
Okay, name all of the reputable/published creationist scientists today - bonus points if you can actually name any that are young-Earth creationists.

Or hell, I'll make it easy for you: name even a SINGLE one. Waiting...
 
Still waiting...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 22:23 GMT
"who is thuderfoot anyway man?"

he';s in your friends list...FFS man don't you even know who you invite or accept as a friend on youtbe?
 
Dammit, warn me next time :)  While reading that, I nearly spit coffee onto my keyboard!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/11 - 22:24 GMT
Then why do you act like the average foul mouthed teen?
 
He is in his teens, though he hasn't come anywhere near the level of vitriol spewed by you - a supposed adult.
 
In other words: what's your excuse?
 
maybe your philosophy causes you to look not as smart as you are.
 
In the same vein as the previous question: is that your excuse?
 
But you are one mean mother.
 
Why thank you. I do try.
 
I won't make any more points that you concider misinformation until the bashing stops.
 
You mean the bashing you initiated, by calling us all evil and comparing us to Hitler?
 
Until then, I will focus on the philosophical soundness of your behaviors.
 
I'll believe that when I see it.
 
Have you ever admitted anything in your life? 
 
Sure, otherwise I'd still be clinging to the "Big Crunch" theory.
 
Or have you been using that IQ to get away with things. lol Philosophy is the soul of a man's brain.
 
That makes no sense whatsoever.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/12 - 2:03 GMT
all I do is research, on one thing or another. that's it. I do nothing but learn. The good, the bad, and the ugly. I don't know the names of sources as there are 100s. 
 
So there hundreds, but you can't name one? Other than David Horowitz, that is.
 
Even college sites I surf has real learning in it. And college isn't all bad. But the culture has another agenda. I know it.
 
Ah, anti-intellectual rhetoric. I knew there was at least one shtick you hadn't tried yet.
 
But I am satified that all the deception will come to light as time marches on, that web that has been weaved, is becoming tangled with each grain of sand that disappears to advance time and reveal why and how the web was woven. 
 
And another new one... well, for you at least. This seems to be a variation on the standard Christian apologist tactic when they've lost an argument, in a nutshell: "Oh yeah, well we'll see who's laughing when you're burning in hell."
 
It's the intellectual equivalent of trying to win an argument by saying "my dad can beat up your dad."
 
Anyone want to bet?
 
It might help if you defined the terms first.
 
How's that socialism working for you in Europe? lol From what I hear, it ain't good. I remember last year Europe said we were going down here in the USA. Tables have turned. Europe, stop your path before you die economically. You killed incentive and have more people poor because of it. And they will get poorer until you admit capitalism is the only way man can be rich and free. Those who want to anyway.
 
Hate to break it to you, Mikey, but it's not the European nations whose economies are imploding at the moment.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/12 - 2:23 GMT
mainstream (Atheistic) medicine
 
In what way is modern medicine atheistic? Because it presumes that causes arise from things other than magical causes?
 
I'd think that you would want to try to "claim" modern medicine as somehow being the "property" of creationists/fundies/whatever. It's certainly has a better track record that prayer when it comes to alleviating human suffering.
 
Now I am supposed trust the ones that know? 
 
Ah, the point emerges - in a nutshell, your reasoning is:
  • medical professionals gave me a diagnosis/advice that possibly turned out to be wrong
  • medicine is a branch of science
  • therefore, all science is wrong and I should distrust it too
This is just another example of the "guilt by association argument," which I've already addressed.
 
Then I found Kent Hovind. I saw him making these same type of people that make these posts look like con men. 
 
I hope you had more sense than to take Hovind's advice to feed your kids peach pits.
 
Now, if I can literally prove real doctors wrong from my chair in thirty minutes. 
 
...by performing less than one tenth of one percent of the "testing" that's required before a new medicine can be sold commercially.
 
When they only know what they were taught is fact. It almost never is. But these kids don't know and are the ones primed for control.

I don't think these are evil people, yet. It is their philosophy that is dangerous. It makes them feel superior and don't doubt their souces 1 ioda. Shame.
 
Once again, you reveal your ignorance of the fundamental principles and practice of science. As I've already mentioned the "White Swan Fallacy" twice now, at this point I can only assume that you're being deliberately dishonest.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/12 - 2:38 GMT
You see, the Bible came first. It is our history. You can't make things up and call it fact
 
Ah, so you're the only one allowed to do that?
 
My history book says there was a flood of global proportions. You are guessing there was not.
 
 
Next?
 
My book says man and dinos lived together.
 
No, it doesn't. It makes a few vague references to dragons, that YECs try to claim are reference to dinosaurs.
 
book says yesterday, today, and tomorrow, have already been? Higher dimentions we could not possibly comprehend let alone act like we know enough to deny it.
 
Please, tell us more about these "dimentions" [sic].
 
There is not one scientist of any honesty that can possitively say I am wrong for a fact. 
 
And, of course, you conveniently left out one minor detail: there isn't a single reputable scientist who would support the bizarre claims you make. They would admit that what you claim is possibly from a philosophical/metaphysical point of view - but they would also make the same admission about the existence of Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny.
 
But I've already addressed that, you're just talking around in circles:
 
But you guys will come in here, and push your opinion off as fact.
 
No, we actually provide sources and reasoned arguments to support our opinion. You simply repeat the same assertions over and over again, and then start ranting about Hitler if anyone challenges you to actually back up your claims.
 
Given your advanced years, and your ability to stick to one topic for more than sentence or two, you might want to get yourself tested for pre-senile dementia. 
 
And then start the insults. It's a pattern. Go ahead, read the posts.
 
And now back to Mikey's regular semi-coherent rambling about Hitler and Marx.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/12 - 3:27 GMT
Wow, investigating me?
 
He looked at the link that you were dumb enough to post - that's hardly investigation.
 
never ending responses?
 
Yours, you mean?
 
low and behold? They act like bullys, when they get shown the bullys they are.
 
Awwww, does the poor baby need a tissue?
 
They actually go and search for things they can try to assassinate your character with.
 
What character? And no, 325 didn't have to search for anything - you handed it to him, dumb ass.
 
What is the next step here loving comrad? Do something about me? I think you would kill me if you could get away with it.
 
And more delusions/fantasies of persecution.
 
What is your name? where do you live? You are the one hiding something aren't you? hehe Yeeaa!
 
You're really losing it, Mikey.
 
You have not shown any good qualities as a human in any of your posts. 
 
Hahahaha. From now on, I'm just going to abbreviate "Pot, Kettle, Black" as "PKB".
 
and don't back up anything by giving your name so maybe you can be looked into.
 
Wow, do you think you could sound any more like a potential stalker?
 
Let me explain it to you, Mikey: this is an online, text-based forum - a place there are exactly two valid criteria to judge your arguments by. Namely, the merit of your arguments and your ability to express them.
 
And on both counts you fail. Spectacularly.
 
But that is what you do , right? Put your name on your accusations or keep them to your hiding self, brother!. Your name is false, but you just hear a story you like and that's your science.
 
Thanks, Mikey - I'll be sure to save that quote for the next time I need an example of psychological projection.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/12 - 3:28 GMT
Okay, name all of the reputable/published creationist scientists today - bonus points if you can actually name any that are young-Earth creationists.

Or hell, I'll make it easy for you: name even a SINGLE one. Waiting...
 
Still waiting...
 
STILL waiting, Mikey...
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/03/13 - 18:15 GMT
"My philosophy is superior because I only believe, but you think you know everything."
 
E.g.
 
This claim is an example of the logical fallacy of "false dichotomy", setup by a strawman argument. The strawman being the implied generalization that "all atheists think they know everything."
 
This notion is absurd because it claims the complete opposite of reality. No one who values intellectual rigor in general (and the scientific method in particular) would claim to know ANYTHING with absolute certainty - much less everything.
 
The basic philosophy of those who value science & intellectual rigor was best-expressed as the "White Swan Fallacy":
 
"No amount of observations of white swans is sufficient to allow the inference that all swans are white - but the observation of a single black swan is sufficient to disprove it."
 
Every intellectually-honest person recognizes that all *good* theories are falsifiable, and therefore provisional. That's true of Christians who practice science (E.g. Ken Miller, Robert Bakker) just as much as it's true of atheists.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/10 - 16:12 GMT
No I didn't think it went into recession. duh cmon' man, stop thinking everyone's an idiot but you. The first reason is when we ran out of silver, her spots began to come back. Then I made it myself and the spots disappeared again. When she got lazy about it about a month after that, she began to flare up again. After she did it for three months and stopped taking it out of irresponsibility. They did not return then.

Here is a new story from my brother.
His friends mom had cancer, got Chemotherapy. She was very depressed and want to die when the doctor said her cultures were positive and she needed Chemotherapy again. She said she would rather die than go through it again. Enter my brother who talked her into it against her families wishes. My brother actually had to convince these fools that their mother had nothing to lose. I guess that was about 7 months ago or so.

When she went for her cultures, her doctor was confused cause her cancer cells were deminishing each time. The doctor now says he was wrong about the cancer coming back. You see my brother asked her not to tell the doctor for fear of the FDA coming down on him.

Now the small amount of cancer cells that do show up on the cultures, this is due to the fact that the silver can't get to her lymphnodes where cancer is I guess in remission or something. But they now have an apparatis that can pulse all 200 and some odds nodes and actually deactivate the cells, and then another apparatis
that can electrically purify the blood at the same time to kill it forever. But is dangerous to purify the blood. Cause everything is now more toxic in the person's system and they need a special diet and can't stop taking silver with our risk of severe illness.

She is scared and my brother told her the cancer won't infect her blood as long as she keeps up the silver. She may not go for the purification. But no one would ever know she has cancer, as she has no more symtoms. I guess they are harmless in the nodes as long as silver is in the system, the blood is cancer free.

Another guy I called from a post that he left his number in said he took it for prostate cancer and his doctor told him he was misdiagosed. But he says he also had diabetes when tested was at 15 which is bad from what I here. those tests went down to a normal blood sugar of 8. And to top it off, he was at the time we spoke using it for his baldspot and now had little hairs growing where there were none.

I had arthritis beginning in my finger joints. My joints haven't hurt since I took the silver. and my knee surgery doesn't bother me anymore.

My mother couldn't walk on her right leg because of a bad knee, now walks pain free, which I don't like cause the pain kept her on her diet. now with no pain, she went off her diet and I stopped giving her the silver cause I don't want that pain to go away. She needs to get to a certain weight for the replacement surgery. It is also fading our scares!

Oh, and none of us taking the silver are getting sick. Slight colds here and there. But no flus for us in almost 2 years folks. I would get real sick about once a years and many bad colds in between. no more.! Oh, and my brother himself for the first time in his life didn't need to go get medicine for his pink eye. He was always getting it. No more. Matter of fact. I think that is when he first took silver. He didn't believe me at first either.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/10 - 16:26 GMT
no man I got my genetics crap from the news report that the reason genes are defective is because the amino acids that build genes are vitamin defficient. and if we can Identify which deficient vitamins, we will be able to suppliment the vitamins and the amino acid will build genes correcting in essence eliminating the gene deffect.

So I google genetics and began reading. Now that lead me to searching out quantum mechanics. I took free classes from the stanford university website. That's right free lectures. By the way. I later found the proffesor to be full of shit and decieved his students by a well worded false statement. "Any device to measure will breakdown the wave function". That is a lie. Now he is either ignorant, stupid or a liar. I found out since that they all propagate this lie.

The delayed decision portion of the double slit experiment proved that the camera used did not breakdown the wave function. "Any device" is a lie, and I know it is a lie as I know the whole results of that experiment. They are doing the same scam the global warming liars are doing.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/10 - 16:44 GMT
oh and by the way, I heard a report yesterday,they think they identified the the deffect that causes autism and know what the defficiences are and expect a cure at the end of the road. Problem is some diseases only have 1 gene deffect to become deffetive. They say those will be easy to cure. It's the diseases that have multiple defficiencies that will take alot longer to identify.

They now have a company that takes your dna test and provides your body with specific vitamins that your particular body doesn't produce enough of. In other words. Stop taking generic multi vitamins. each person's body uses vitamins differently and makes different amounts available. You could actually do more harm than good taking one a day
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/10 - 16:56 GMT
colloidal silver is dangerous? That is another lie man.

Before I explain. Did you know that 188,000 people die per year directky from a bad reaction from antibiotics?

Not 1 death has been attributed to colloidal silver.
However, if you overdose it, it can't kill you but you do risk a condition called argyria. A condition that makes your skin get a blue tint. The term "blue bloods" came from this. Those people cooked in silver, ate with silver, put silver in their food and liquids to preserve them. But i wouldn't call that dangerous. funny maybe. Again. The atheists have been telling more lies.

Them fucks kill people with their medicine and have the balls to call turning blue dangerous. Oh and the one guy I found that has it was drinking a quart to a half gallon a day man. He won't stop cause he said the doctors told him he was dead and now he is alive because of silver. He said he would rather be blue than dead.

but you only need a teaspoon a day for maintainence. 4 oz if need curing for some severe diseases. If you want me to explain why you can turn blue from overdosing it I can explain but it is easily found on the net.

Genewize is the company making vitamins for your specific DNA
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/10 - 17:49 GMT
"Before I explain. Did you know that 188,000 people die per year directky from a bad reaction from antibiotics?"
 
yes.
and i also know that collodial silver isn;t used at the same scale and thus you have no statistics to compare it with.
 
"colloidal silver is dangerous? That is another lie man."
 
no it's not.
any accumulation of metals in your cells is potentially dangerous.
 
specially if it's a metal that isn't known to the organisms homeostasis.
 
"Not 1 death has been attributed to colloidal silver."
 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15111684?dopt=Citation
WOW, that was easy to debunk.
 
" it can't kill you but you do risk a condition called argyria."
 
ooooh, it can.
 
"Them fucks kill people with their medicine and have the balls to call turning blue dangerous."
 
oh...yes..
penecil is baaaaad.
 
"He won't stop cause he said the doctors told him he was dead and now he is alive because of silver."
 
link?
i want to know his condition, lenght of treatment and original diagnosis.
 
|severe diseases.
 
BACETRIAL INFECTIONS. anything else and you'd just be pumping silver into your cells.
 
"Genewize is the company making vitamins for your specific DNA"
 
that was random, american and exremely irritating to watch, but WTF?
they don't make vitemins, they map the genes, look at the resulting metabolic charts. and then determine the doses (based on a specfic or basic diet)
and this isn't new.
and it will still be a some years before they mapped the relationships between DNA, expression rates, diet and metabolism to sucha  degree that these regimes can accurately be made.
(this is one of the fields i might end up in when i have my degree).
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/10 - 19:10 GMT
yep communism is responsible. It is you commies that make islam legit, so you can bash us with it. But don't worry you europeans. the enemy of your enemy is about to smash europe. You people are afraid to even utter a word against this real evil. You punks pick on us cause we are safe for cowards to bash. Now doc. tell me I'm wrong. Comrad
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2010/06/11 - 2:40 GMT
Only reason for someone to get the reaction of being blue is asphyxiation or lack of oxygen. Now that doesn't sound good does it?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/11 - 11:29 GMT
"Only reason for someone to get the reaction of being blue is asphyxiation or lack of oxygen."
 
or you get large amounts of silver dissolved in your cells..
 
say hello to papa smurf.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/13 - 21:54 GMT
Before I explain. Did you know that 188,000 people die per year directky from a bad reaction from antibiotics?

Not 1 death has been attributed to colloidal silver.
 
By that reasoning, you should also be an advocate of medicinal marijauna.
 
Of course, you've managed to leave out all useful context for those statistics - as 325ad pointed out, antibiotics are in much more widespread use than colloidal silver.
 
Them fucks kill people with their medicine and [...] Genewize is the company making vitamins for your specific DNA
 
 
Yada yada yada, more TL;DR from Mikey.
 
Allow me to summarize:
 
"Quantum physics means that anything can happen at any time for no reason."
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 11:48 GMT
Hitler was an Atheist. He used God to manipulate the people. You can't be stupid enough to think that is even valid.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 12:17 GMT
Good thing you don't believe the earth is flat. No one will ever penetrate your indoctrination. You see the reason silver is not used is that you cannot put a patent on mineral water. So you can't make a killing with silver like you can a drug. 
 
Yes our medicine is Atheistic. You research why. I'm tired of brainwashed know it alls acting authoritative. 
 
You should write your dad for more money for classes. You seem not to be able to learn, unless taught by an Atheist professor.
 
You tell me how you can complain about silver? When the medicine you support blindingly faithful, kills 188,000 people a year. Show me one example of death from taking silver over drugs, just one. What you will find are all these people being told they were dieing and now they live because of silver. Did you know silver can kill over 650 pathogens that can live in your body? Did you know that nothing can be immune to silver? cause it deactivates them. Viruses don't develop immunity(that's atheistic), rather, some of the population are already immune, they just are the only ones to survive and take over the population. We found a 150,000,000(supposedly) year old bacteria, alive and immune just as the ones today that were assumed to evolve the immunity. 
 
Maybe if you listen to enough atheists, you can teach me how silver is the most dangerous substance on earth, and how we have to protect people from evil stupid fucks like me. lol Mind numbed robot(slave) you are dude.
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 12:24 GMT
Atheism is a religion cause they won the decision in court, so they could be non profit. Now if you want it to be more then religion. You'll have to go back to court and beat the Atheists that say it is.!!!! lol It just proves how phony Atheists are.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 12:30 GMT
No. You monkeys like to blame religion for the evils of the world. And that is my response to that fallacy.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 12:35 GMT
Hitler was an Atheist. I can't help it if your too brainwashed to know the truth. For the same reason Obama won't say he is a communist. Hitler would say he was a christian. But we are the dumb ones. You still believe hitler and stalin. lol wake up. Just another parrot.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 12:40 GMT
No genius, The bar slides according to the needs of the service. There was a high enough need to justify her waver. They both had her name. Army called first when they came up short and began giving the wavers before the air force did.
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 12:52 GMT
No man. Atheists think they are smarter. So they want their opinions to be facts. So my problem is with Atheism. They feel cause they are smarter, they can lie to us stupid people for our own good. If you are an Atheist, the ends justifies the means, and as such they are by proxy liars and have to be scrutinized in everything they assert as fact. Cause it almost never is fact. I think we would be a lot further along had not Atheists dragged the stupid people in their direction with lies and false assumptions put to us as scientific fact. It is a crime against humanity and you worry about the harm believing in God does. You are either an "useful idiot" or evil. That's it. Now if you are not evil, you need to recognize the need to un-indoctrinate yourself and become a free thinker again and rage against the new "evil" machine.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 12:56 GMT
you are pathetic dude. lol
 
Let me ask you a question. Are you a liar?
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 13:02 GMT
You should read atlas shrugged. I hear her insulted a lot by you know it alls. But you know what? She was there and talks from experience. An eyewitness account. But hey, what's that matter to a know it all. You don't need experience, you have been taught. lol fools
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 13:12 GMT
If you deem I deserve it? Hold the presses!!! We have god in our presents. You see, no God, then man can deem, problem is, the scale of what each man deems is different. With no God, the deeming is done by who is in charge. Stalin deemed the christians needed to be exterminated. God was deemed in his way. Atheism is evil because you can't predict who will be in charge and what the new deemed is, becomes a chain worn by all. 
 
You should read The road to serfdom. Hayak wrote it I think.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 13:22 GMT
Ok, let's stop the pussy footing lies. Are you saying here, that the millions of comments about the evils of religion coming from the leading scholars to the Atheist children are all full of shit? Because I never new the commies slaughtered 100,000,000 people until I tried to find all the people the evil christians killed and found that it was the communists responsible for many more deaths then a human could imagine. And it don't even bother your evil fucking heart one bit does it comrad?
 
!00,000,000 and counting. no problem with that? Those numbers are low too btw. So if that doesn't bother you, then it is ok for us to catch up with Atheist slaughters? 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 13:23 GMT
You can't be that brainwashed. Phony!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 13:37 GMT
You need to read and listen. People are saying it all over the mainstream and you never hear one Atheist on camera denying it. EVER!!! But on these low life blogs. "tellll mee comrad, vhere are the bodies/" "where has this occured" "liar!" there are no such deaths, atheists are loving unlike you evil christians. You are all full of shit. You lie, cheat, sneak and steal and you can't be trusted as far as you can be thrown. Your philosophy is what it is, presumptuous and evil. 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 14:22 GMT
You have got to be kidding me? Why are you wasting money on school? You already know. You are one of those that is all over your professor's stick huh? 
 
It is from an european gov site. lol No lying atheists there.
 
Notice the wording folks. Where does it say silver did it? Notice how the faithful 325ad debunked silver completely in his mind. And yet those people who wrote that were very careful to make it sound like they were saying silver did when they absolutely did not attribute the death to silver. a hundred things could have caused it. Silver can't fix an aneurysm or other physical conditions.  
 
I can see the game played in the wording. 325ad accepted as fact silver kills is only making my point. If I said I was a professor, this moron would believe anything I said. But I am not. And for that, I could hold the truth of the universe and he would shit on it. The more I see you write the smaller your true intellect gets comrad. 
 
Thanks for that link. It proves how they are corrupt to the core. A lawyer couldn't have written it better. And it was deliberately deceptive for the dumb to say silver kills. He will go around the net saying how he debunked the fallacy that silver is safe. Dude, you are either dumb or evil. that's it.
 
How much silver did he take? how many times a day? where is their details you asked of me fool? why you let them con you? and come here fully deceived and unaware how they just manipulated you. Acting like you are all knowing. you are just their pawn.
 
And notice how 188,000 dead a year is acceptable broken eggs for that omlet. But a 1 death not even blamed but only suggested is unacceptable? you have got to be kidding me. These fools will be in positions of power possibly. They really are educated idiots. He can't even read one paragraph without being duped, and those lying professors will have him for what 8 years? Silver is as safe as any medicine you take stupid. Find me that death please. cause millions have taken silver, that is all you can find? a paragraph that doesn't say silver is the cause of death? Why don't you find a family member who has something they are told can't be cured. Like lyme disease. And try the silver on them and see for yourself. You will let them suffer cause you know, right? Geneticist my ass. You should collect trash.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 14:36 GMT
And by the way. You can overdose on anything including water. So unless you show their dosage genius. Claims that silver is toxic are false. For if we were to use your logic. Water killed that lady in the drinking contest. So let's ban water. lol I will bring the article up and debunk the safe water claims. lol
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 14:59 GMT
"Hitler was an Atheist. He used God to manipulate the people. You can't be stupid enough to think that is even valid."
 
if you're going to go agaisnt what hitler himself said...well then i can't argue with you.
 
but even if he WERE an atheist, then he was still able to tap into the huge antisemitism stored in europes christian denominations.
that alone means that the holocaust is partially caused by religious sentiment.
 
 
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 15:22 GMT
"You see the reason silver is not used is that you cannot put a patent on mineral water"
 
no, because silver is an nonselective, mainly antimicrobial (and not even all microbes at that),you can't get it everywhere throughout the body (try getting silverions to bacteria infecting your bronchi) and on top of that it accumulates faster then you can process it when used regularly.
 
and now for the fun part.
microbes might jsut aswell evolve resitance to silver as they would to antibiotics. antibiotics are just easier.
 
"You research why."
because you need evidence before you know if a compound really works.
just like the doctor only bases his diagnoses on symptoms, and not prayer.
 
"You should write your dad for more money for classes. You seem not to be able to learn, unless taught by an Atheist professor."
 
and yet i almost finished my first year....go figure..
 
"When the medicine you support blindingly faithful, kills 188,000 people a year."
statistics statistics.
oh, and it's not just antibiotics that kill, its also antipsychotics and other medication designed to treat ailments that silver just can't touch.
 
"Show me one example of death from taking silver over drugs, just one"
 
i gave a link, but again...statistics, statistics.
 
"What you will find are all these people being told they were dieing and now they live because of silver."
 
is it really the silver? cohorts studies say no.
 
"Did you know silver can kill over 650 pathogens that can live in your body?"
wow....now why doesn'y that sound big to me?
because there are WAY more then 650 MICROBIAL pathogens that an make you sick, i haven't heard silver curign malaria now have I? or cancer.
 
"Did you know that nothing can be immune to silver?"
my cell biology classes teach me otherwise.
all you need is a suffieciently strong enoguh gradient and a AG+ port.
 
"cause it deactivates them."
 
only in sufficiently high concentrations (which are already low when it comes to bacteria), and when they lack the means to cope (like not having the above mentioned AG+ port).
 
"Viruses don't develop immunity(that's atheistic)"
show me evidence that silver even touches viral RNA, or reverese transcriptase in the nucleus.
 
"rather, some of the population are already immune, they just are the only ones to survive and take over the population."
 
WHICH IS EXACTLY HOW YOU EVOLVE IMMUNITY!
 
"We found a 150,000,000(supposedly) year old bacteria, alive and immune just as the ones today that were assumed to evolve the immunity. "
i already explained this was possible, and not that remarkable.
 
"you can teach me how silver is the most dangerous substance on earth"
 
and when did we claim that?
 
jeez, it's all blakc and white to you isn;t it?
 
"and how we have to protect people from evil stupid fucks like me."
 
now if you started claiming collodial silver cures cancer, THEN i'd be worried.
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 15:24 GMT
"Atheism is a religion cause they won the decision in court, so they could be non profit."
 
link?
 
although i suspect this has a little more nuance to the courts decision, or the case in general.
 
why only give taxexempt status to people who believe without evidence?
HELL i could also runa  charity to help people, and not include god in it.
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 15:25 GMT
"No. You monkeys like to blame religion for the evils of the world. And that is my response to that fallacy."
 
quote the fallacy next time?
otherwise this only looks like: "PEW PEW PEW! machinegun posting!"
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 15:33 GMT
"She was there and talks from experience."
 
you mean this book?
because that's a work of fiction, no need for eyewitness accounts there.
 
and i wil ltry to read it once i have the time.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 15:36 GMT
"Stalin deemed the christians needed to be exterminated."
 
and not jsut the christians, quit monopolizing the victim role.
 
"Atheism is evil because you can't predict who will be in charge and what the new deemed is, becomes a chain worn by all. "
 
and hence the reason we all should unite in a commen set of human values instead of being bogged down by terms man wrote up 2000 years ago.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 15:39 GMT
"Because I never new the commies slaughtered 100,000,000 people until I tried to find all the people the evil christians killed"
 
????they never taught you about the holocaust or stalin or moa in school??!
 
"communists responsible for many more deaths then a human could imagine"
 
and they are athesit by defacto because?
 
the christian faith encompassed more communism (not marx's version) then most social democracies have nowadays.
 
giving away all your possesions any1?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 15:41 GMT
"You need to read and listen. People are saying it all over the mainstream and you never hear one Atheist on camera denying it."
 
saying what?
 
QUOTE.
 
btw still no reply about skype...
mmmmmm
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 16:03 GMT
'Why are you wasting money on school? You already know."
 
lols/./
don't put words into our mouths.
we are in school to LEARN more, truly the human life is to short to endulgde in all the knowledge we've gained in the last 40 years alone.
 
"It is from an european gov site. lol No lying atheists there."
 
your inabilty of quoting is REALLY hampering our ability to adress your statements.
if you are talking about pubmed...that's US and it's about where the paper was published in: Neurology. 2004 Apr 27;62(8):1408-10.
 
"Where does it say silver did it?"
IN THE PAPER YOU MORON.
why else would they put it in the conclusion in the abstract?
it wouldn't have gotter through peer review is the abstract wasn't in accordance with the content of the paper.
 
'Notice how the faithful 325ad debunked silver completely in his mind."
 
AND with the case documentation.
 
"325ad accepted as fact silver kills"
 
no it CAN kill in large dosis.
i'm not saying you shouldn't use it as anti spetic, i'm saying you should take regular doses as a "cure it all " drug.
 
'this moron would believe anything I said."
 
only if i'd seen your credentials, and read your papers to see if your really knew your field of study.
 
"And for that, I could hold the truth of the universe and he would shit on it."
 
then how about you denomstrate that  "truth" then ina  skype conversation? or ina  well reasoned out argument.
 
"It proves how they are corrupt to the core."
lolz.
these are researches dude. they have no motivation to be corrupt, and especially not in a neurology journal if the main use of collodal silver is antiseptic.
 
'Dude, you are either dumb or evil. that's it."

OR you're beigna  dishonest jackass who manages to miss my points and twist my words, if you aren't puttign them in my mouth that is...
 
"How much silver did he take? how many times a day?"
 
in the paper.
 
"And notice how 188,000 dead a year is acceptable broken eggs for that omlet."
with the massive amount of membrane diversity, it's no wonder there are people allergic to organic compounds.
but again...statistics statistics...
 
"But a 1 death not even blamed but only suggested is unacceptable?"
nooo,
my point was that it CAN kill, and therefore there IS a risk of fatality to taking silver.
 
we KNOW there are risks to standard antibiotics and WE LIST THEM ON THE PACKEGING.
 
"Silver is as safe as any medicine you take stupid."
 
exactly. and no medicine is withouth risk, or limitations
 
" cause millions have taken silver,"
 
show me those statistics.

'Why don't you find a family member who has something they are told can't be cured. Like lyme disease. And try the silver on them and see for yourself."
 
and if they still die?
"aah it wasn't the silvers fault!"
or if it's the normal medication they are takign along with the silver?
"SILVER works! just look here!"
...
yaaaa, right.
it's called conformation bias.
 
people have done these kidns of studies, and that's why we can say silver isn't that effective outside of antisceptic purposes.

'You will let them suffer cause you know, right? Geneticist my ass."
 
and what? give them false hope? or potentially making the problem worse?
your reasoning is why there are still faith healers and homeopaths duping people out of their money when they have nowhere else to turn.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 16:06 GMT
"For if we were to use your logic. Water killed that lady in the drinking contest. So let's ban water."
 
except you're forgettign about the DOSAGE ISSUE.
or the fact that water is essential, whereas the body has no use for silver additives above normal diet.
HOW hard is this to understand?
taking regular doses of soemthign your boby doesn't need means it's beign expelled. and when it doesn't expell it fast enough, it accmumulates, which has physiological consequences.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 21:49 GMT
You two faced little punk. No fucking way you run your mouth like this in the open. 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 22:07 GMT
Now you are a fucking silver expert after reading 1 post you piece of shit?
 
What good are you to the world? your are the problem. Lying, sneaking , thieving snake. Being stupid and educated = worthless and dangerous. Maybe we ought to talk about freeing the world of your ilk? Want to fight? Coward! You like using fighting words. You are why tyrants keep but fucking Europe. Big mouths and all talk. Ain't won a war yet. We Evil Americans keep saving your worthless asses. Hows that grab you? Want work us up punk. What has your punk ass done for anyone but yourself? Who's money you leaching for that worthless education? You are just pissed that a man like me has all the money I need and ain't on your antiGod warpath. Meanwhile, you are miserable from your lack of ambition petty little go nowhere life style. You are a loser that makes yourself feel better by belittling people with fraudulent  information, put forth as fact. Muslims will take care of you wimps. hehe I can't wait.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 22:23 GMT
that was my point moron. Dosage. before 1940's, silver was THE antibiotic. millions have and still are taking it. You and your ilk are going down genius, the lies won't stand. And when they fall, watch your backs. Cause we will be coming after you folks for a change. We are almost there. That's why you are afraid to admit you are a commie. Commies are the enemy of the people of the world. You guys fuck up everything you get your hands on. Then blame others for problems you godless fucks cause. When it's time to fight, you fucks hide like rats from the light. So keep pushing you fuck and maybe we can make a headline. GRR!!!! I wish there were still duels. You cowards must have stopped that when we weren't looking. "Look, now we can lie and hurt people legally". lol 
 
Everyone knows God is real moron. read a little before you go talking you uneducated and stupid egotist.
 
 
 
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/16 - 23:42 GMT
When you mock those after they affirm a belief and you try to shoot it down, calling the bullshit you fling truth. If the reason that God is believed in is ignorance, then you are the deluded one. And Atheists made that very same argument to get tax exempt status. You fucking lying snakes called them brilliant for the very same comment you call me stupid for. Sounds like you are just being a lawyer playing with loopholes rather than a hopeful geneticist looking for the truth. It's people like you that make this world rotten. So take your corrupted worthless point of view and poison your children with it. oh! I forgot, you guys aren't having kids anymore. Is that because you guys are so smart? Your birth rate dominated by Atheistic society is below 2 now all through europe. Keep calling us morons, when your philosophy's demise is right underneath your know it all noses. We believers know you need to keep families together and maintain 3 children per family to avoid extinction. I'm just glad it's all you atheists getting the abortions and and letting go of the old out dated family values thing. hehe You are dooming your children and you call everybody else stupid. Why aren't you on the muslim forums? Chicken shit. Any fool knows it's a fraud. Yet, you take the impossible task of proving the bible wrong, just once. Why you like muslims so much and hate us? lol
 
After all, they want you all dead. I just want to sock you in the nose for being a disrespectful little punk. Are you in bed with the muslims? or just scared at the real evil in the world? But you want to squash evil Christianity. You wonder why I am bitter with you. You are my peoples enemy. You and your people work very hard to kill our God, too hard. And yet you cowards don't utter a word about allah. Are all Europeans cowards? or just most of you? Get off our forum you evil little troll! You should thank your lucky stars we aren't muslim. They won't take your shit. They might be after us too, pug, but at least we can fight. lol
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/17 - 0:00 GMT
You guys want to keep pissing us off. I am going to piss you guys off.
 
You guys lose every time you have to fight. napoleon, evil loser. Hitler, evil loser. mussolini, evil loser. one or 2 more and we can think Europe's only great people are evil.
 
You guys got rid of all the christians in your countries, check the demographics. Why are you guys so bumble fucked? All Atheists in agreement and you guys are up shits creek with no stupid christians to blame. just all Atheists swearing it's not Atheism that is destroying them.
 
It's our fault right? lol The fall of europe is coming and you folks know it. It will end when those collecting the wealth of others drys up. Then you will all be serfs again. Ripe for a muslim uprising completing the repeating of the past europe has never learned from, cause they are so smart. Want to hurt me yet comrad? GRR!!! because there is more truth in this post then all your bullshit combined. You should educate yourself about your evil failed philosophy before insulting a better view of our destiny.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/17 - 16:18 GMT
"You two faced little punk. No fucking way you run your mouth like this in the open. "
 
irony.
it's a bitch ain't it?
 
how am i two faced btw?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/17 - 16:30 GMT
"Now you are a fucking silver expert after reading 1 post you piece of shit?"
 
no, i am just a bit more aware of the effect of METAL IONS IN CYTOPLASM.
because that happens to be part of my curriculum.
 
"What good are you to the world? your are the problem. Lying, sneaking"
 
sequencing protiens, debatign creationists, being trained to think up creative and sustainable solutions for the future....
ooh yes, i am the embodiment of evil right?
 
"Being stupid and educated = worthless and dangerous. Maybe we ought to talk about freeing the world of your ilk? Want to fight? Coward! You like using fighting words."
 
so i take it you WON'T be adressing the lethality of high concentrations of silver in your cytoplasm, caused by regular dosing of useless silverions?
 
"You are why tyrants keep but fucking Europe."
...i wouldn't call NL a tyrranny..
just look at the political diversity we have.
 
"Big mouths and all talk"
 
AND sourcing arugments...
 
"Ain't won a war yet."
 
wel it's not liek we started 2 of them in the last 10 years.....
 
"We Evil Americans keep saving your worthless asses."
 
from what? muslim terrorist bombing YOUR towers?
you didnt save the people in london, and you didn't save them in madrid, and you're STILL not saving them when our internal security agencies round up suspected plots.
 
"What has your punk ass done for anyone but yourself?"
 
you don't want to know the answer to that. that much is obvious from the tone. so i won't be positng a list.
 
'Who's money you leaching for that worthless education"
 
mine, my parents and the tax payers,
just like the rest of the students here.
 
"You are just pissed that a man like me has all the money I need and ain't on your antiGod warpath."
 
????
why on earth would i be jealos of your (unknown)wealth?
all i need is friends a modal income, a fun job and enough time o at least enjoy myself and others.
 
really...your paranioa has reache a whole new level..
 
"You are a loser that makes yourself feel better by belittling people with fraudulent  information"
 
so you are calling the article fraudulant?
 
go and write a letter to the editors then.
and while you're at it, might aswell post it here.
 
"Muslims will take care of you wimps."
ooh boy.
"hehe I can't wait."
 
neither can i. i just can't w8 for the time when they actually are stupid enough to try and convince us of something by putting their religious arguments on a public fora, so  can adress them outside of the freedom of religious and the respect for privacy.
 
 
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/17 - 16:41 GMT
"before 1940's, silver was THE antibiotic"
 
ANTISEPTIC.
antibiotics are by definition organic compounds. go look it up.
and that would aslo explain why the mortality rate of infections was much higher before pennicilin was commercially available?
 
"millions have and still are taking it"
 
no statistics apparently...
 
" Cause we will be coming after you folks for a change. We are almost there."
 
ooooh, yes...i am so afraid......-_-.
 
"you fucks hide like rats from the light."
 
TF, drawmohammed day, dawkins, hitchens, sweden...it'd not really call that "hiding"...
 
'GRR!!!! I wish there were still duels."
 
...deathtreats?
DEATHTREATS? you actually wish you could duel me to the DEATH??
(i am using the duel standard as set in the 1800s)

"ou cowards must have stopped that when we weren't looking."
 
no i;m pretty sure it was A COURT OF LAW that stopped such barbaricism.
 
"Everyone knows God is real moron."
 
and yet of all the people i know, only a few are deistic, even less theistic and even less atheistic...
 
'read a little before you go talking you uneducated and stupid egotist."
....i'd stick to the relevent text books for now. strapped for tiem as it is atm..
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/17 - 16:51 GMT
"napoleon, evil loser"
and a frenchman joined the party..
(the prussians saved us from that you know)
 
and on a side note, guess who gave us a rule of law, surnames and spread the idea of the enlightenment?
 
"mussolini, evil loser."
 
who held gr8 links with the vatican....
 
"one or 2 more and we can think Europe's only great people are evil."
 
while we're at it, go list vlad the impaler and bloody mary..
 
really, the socia-economic and the historical positions between europe till now and america after the colonisation are so vastly different.
 
'You guys got rid of all the christians in your countries, check the demographics."
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nederland
 
ehm...that was so easy to refute?
 
"Why are you guys so bumble fucked?"
 
...high literacy rates, smaller wealthgaps, higher schooled population...
you make "bumble fucked" sound like a good thing.
 
"just all Atheists swearing it's not Atheism that is destroying them."
 
it's REALLY amusing to heard someone say europe is going to hell ina handbasket WHEN HE DOESN"T EVEN LIVE THERE.
 
'when those collecting the wealth of others drys up."
 
you understand that WE INVEST THE TAX IN GENERATIGN A STRONGER MIDDLE CLASS, right? after i finish my study i will have an higher then average wage, and pay back my tuition subsidy so that the next generation can benefit from it.
 
"Want to hurt me yet comrad?"
no

"because there is more battshit in this post then all your bullshit combined."
agreed. (modification mine)
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/18 - 21:25 GMT
"I forgot, you guys aren't having kids anymore. Is that because you guys are so smart? Your birth rate dominated by Atheistic society is below 2 now all through europe"
 
so?
slowly decreasing the world population by less then 2 kids per couple is actually a good thing.
it alleviates preassure on natural resources, so we can figure out more tiem to better exploit them, and more importantly to better distribute them.
 
"e believers know you need to keep families together and maintain 3 children per family to avoid extinction."
 
no, you need anything over 2.0, any more and you get a growth rate, wich in the long run is only going to create more stress on the finite resources. like water.
 
"I'm just glad it's all you atheists getting the abortions and and letting go of the old out dated family values thing."
 
there are many more odes of rasing a family apart form the "traditional system". also birth control is the main reason for the low birht rates. contraception allows couples to plan when they are going to get their kids, and how many. and when you spend most of your 20s studying or building carriers, you're gonna be settlign downa  lot later then joe the plumber.
 
"Why aren't you on the muslim forums?"
 
who says i'm not?
 
"Yet, you take the impossible task of proving the bible wrong,"
the bible does that itself well enough.
 
"Why you like muslims so much and hate us? lol"
 
i don't hate either of you, but i fidn you equally frustrating.
 
"After all, they want you all dead."
 
way to make a hasty generalization...
 
"I just want to sock you in the nose for being a disrespectful little punk."
 
aaah, the irony when this comes from someone who thinks all muslims are out to get us, and  that the medical establisment is run by an atheist cabal...
 
"or just scared at the real evil in the world?"
 
why would i be scared of something i can eliviate?
if there is evil, you have to go and try to fix it, not cower from it.
 
"You wonder why I am bitter with you. You are my peoples enemy."
 
what a beautiful "us VS them" mentality... that's what creates scisms in a society...
 
"You and your people work very hard to kill our God, too hard"
 
how do you kill that, which does not exist?
 
"And yet you cowards don't utter a word about allah."
 
Allah is abhramans god.
muslims see Christ as anothe prophet, Allah is YOUR god, just as much as Jaweh is. just with different cultural strign attached.
 
"Get off our forum you evil little troll!"
 
pot.kettle.black.
 
"You should thank your lucky stars we aren't muslim."
 
of you'r decapitate me instead of puching me?
 
 
but still no skype?
i guess not..
 
"Are all Europeans cowards? or just most of you?"
|projection|
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/18 - 21:44 GMT
I was in europe for 2 years. I could not believe 43 pounds a week is what my friend was living off of. You guys are so brainwashed. We have no poor here. Our welfare checks are bigger then your paychecks. There are only rich and lazy in america. The poor are far and few between. It's been the commie line from day one. It's for the poor people. Now you are all poor and deluding yourselves that your poverty ain't so bad, at least it's spread around. Happy my butt, you are a miserable Atheist, so mad you come on our sites to vent your happiness. If you were happy, you would have never been here. But at least you toned down the rhetoric.  
 
One thing is for sure time will bare out whether what I said is bat shit. 
 
As far as I'm concerned, this scenario has already been played out. But you folks have forgot about the past, and are doomed to repeat it. You pacify the evil people, then they take your land. It is happening again, right now as we write. So let's see. War does not  = evil. Evil is why war is fought. We can't help it you folks won't fight the evil when it's weak. While you pat yourselves on the back for being so loving, the evil plots your next fall. What's it matter if you think I am wrong. What happens, happens, good luck going gentle into the night.
 
I'm not rich, I don't want to work that hard. I just have what I need and some of what I want. I would have more, but you commies are dragging us down a little, and some people still buy the lie here.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 10:46 GMT
"I could not believe 43 pounds a week is what my friend was living off of."
 
i live of 54 euros. with rent and the rest paid.
and it's enough to sustain me. but then again, i don't work and i have to spend my days studying. if i worked saterdays i'd earn 8euro's an hour for about 6-15 hours a week or so.
 
"We have no poor here."
 
oh yes you do.
maybe not in your direct neibourhood, but go look in the getto's in the big cities.
the US has the one largest welfare gap of all of the western countries.
hell, even russia beats you in the CIA factbook.
 
and we don't even rank that much lower with average wages. not when you factor in the distribution of the wages.
 
"There are only rich and lazy in america."
 
and the people who cannot afford to specialize in any field uf study because they don't have the starting capital to do so...
ever wonder why there are more people form the middleclass with degress then those of the lower classes?

"The poor are far and few between"
 
or they are stacke don top of each other in poor neighbourhoods..
where their poverty triggers crime....
 
"It's for the poor people.'
 
that's not just a commie line, that's a christian line.
 
" Now you are all poor and deluding yourselves that your poverty ain't so bad,"
 
depends on your definition of poor here.
i don't need a 120 000 euro/ year salary to be happy.
(that's how much our prime minister earns. (public function max value))
 
"you are a miserable Atheist,"
 
oooh no i am not ^_^.
 
"If you were happy, you would have never been here."
 
care to explain this?
wether i am happy or not has nothgin to do with why i am here.
but of course i won't say reading the batshit posted here doesn't amuse.
 
'But at least you toned down the rhetoric.  "
 
toned down the rethoric?
your are the one who has been wielding the most fiery, and above all, violent and disrespectfull rethoris here.
EG: you STILL repeat blatant lies about what atheist is and what it is "supposidly" responisble for.
 
"You pacify the evil people, then they take your land."
 
I still don't see mandatory shria law, even in england.
 
 
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 13:48 GMT
You monkeys like to blame religion for the evils of the world.
 
Oh, so you're contending that religion *isn't* a motivation for things like islamic or zionist extremism?
 
And that is my response to that fallacy.
 
But I see you're still too much of a coward to respond to 325's skype request. And a hypocrite to boot, since you keep repeating the "you're hiding behind a computer" claim over and over again.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 13:53 GMT
Hitler was an Atheist.
 
Wrong, and that's been pointed out to you numerous times. At least *try* not to make it so obvious that you're just lying through your teeth.
 
But we are the dumb ones. You still believe hitler and stalin. lol wake up. Just another parrot.
 
And, given your history of backing up your claims, I'm sure you'll get around to posting some evidence... any day now (waiting).
 
I also see you're still too much of a coward to respond to 325's skype request. And a hypocrite to boot, since you keep repeating the "you're hiding behind a computer" claim over and over again.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 20:08 GMT
Hitler was an Atheist.
 
Anything to back that up? Anything other than your wishful thinking, that is.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 20:31 GMT
Yes our medicine is Atheistic.
 
Why, because it assumes that effects don't arise by magic or because the patient displeased some deity? Hint: that's not "atheistic", that's secularist at most.
 
You research why.
 
And I see that "burden of proof" is another concept you're still having trouble with.
 
You should write your dad for more money for classes.
 
Or maybe follow your brilliant strategy of setting up a hideously-ugly website & using it to push some kind of MLM scam.
 
Viruses don't develop immunity(that's atheistic), rather, some of the population are already immune, they just are the only ones to survive and take over the population.
 
...are you really such a gigantic idiot that you fail you realize you just described the process of adaptation through natural selection? AKA, the exact same process by which viruses develop immunity (at least according to "atheistic" science and medicine).
 
Sweet merciful crap, how do you even remember to breathe?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 20:36 GMT
Atheism is a religion cause they won the decision in court, so they could be non profit.
 
First: reference?
 
Second: you're trying to broadly-generalize based on actions of one particular group (or person?) & and court case that I, at least, hadn't even heard of. Didn't mommy ever tell you that "all generalizations are inherently false (including this one)"?
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 20:42 GMT
Hitler was an Atheist.
 
The amusing thing is that you're clearly trying to put one of Hitler's beliefs into practice ("Tell a lie long enough and people will start to believe it").
 
Hitler would say he was a christian.
 
Standard Christian apologist cop-out: whenever there's an atrocity committed by one of your own, you just trot out the lazy excuse of "Oh, well they aren't a *real* Christian."
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 20:49 GMT
So my problem is with Atheism.
 
Really? I'm sure no one could have ever guessed that.
 
If you are an Atheist...
 
...then there's a good chance you're smart enough to see through the pathetically-obvious lies that Mikey just copy-pastes over and over again.
 
Now if you are not evil, you need to recognize the need to un-indoctrinate yourself and become a free thinker again and rage against the new "evil" machine.
 
That's quite possibly the dumbest, most cliche-riddled sentence I've read in my entire life.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 21:04 GMT
You should read atlas shrugged.
 
Way ahead of you there, Mikey - by about a decade and a half.
 
Of course, it's highly amusing that you'd recommend a book written by an atheist whos opposition collectivism was only matched by her opposition to religion.
 
She was there and talks from experience. An eyewitness account
 
Um, what? Atlas Shrugged was set in a fictionalized 1930s America - how the hell could she give an eyewitness account of a fictional setting? Maybe you should try reading the actual novel, and not just the conservapedia entry.
 
Free hint: having actually read her work, I'd say it's probably We The Living that you're referring to.
 
You don't need experience, you have been taught.
 
Whereas you apparently don't even have the benefit of education.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 21:15 GMT
you are pathetic dude. lol
 
Are you taking English lessons from ronnie now?
 

Let me ask you a question. Are you a liar?
 
 
Just when I think it isn't possible for you to get any more asinine (or is that "inane"? I guess both would apply here)...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 21:23 GMT
You see, no God, then man can deem, problem is, the scale of what each man deems is different. With no God, the deeming is done by who is in charge.
[...]
Atheism is evil because you can't predict who will be in charge and what the new deemed is, becomes a chain worn by all.
 
Don't look now, Mikey, but you've just described the way organized religions operate in general. The "authority" is merely any person who can be the loudest and most-convincing in claming to speak for such-and-such deity.
 
You should read The road to serfdom. Hayak wrote it I think.
 
Have you actually read this one, Mikey?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 21:32 GMT
So if that doesn't bother you, then it is ok for us to catch up with Atheist slaughters?
 
Is that some sort of thinly-veiled death threat, Mikey? Wow, I didn't think even you were that stupid.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 21:37 GMT
otherwise this only looks like: "PEW PEW PEW! machinegun posting!"
 
And, according to Mikey's own reasoning, such a high volume of posts can only mean that he's paid to post here. For Mikey's sake, I hope he has a "no refunds" policy.
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 21:49 GMT
you mean this book?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shrugged


because that's a work of fiction, no need for eyewitness accounts there.

and i wil ltry to read it once i have the time.
 
Don't worry, it doesn't look like Mikey has actually read it himself - Ayn Rand literally referred to organized religion as a protection racket:
 
"For centuries, the mystics of spirit had existed by running a protection racket - by making life on earth unbearable, then charging you for consolation and relief, by forbidding all the virtues that make existence possible, then riding on the shoulders of your guilt, by declaring production and joy to be sins, then collecting blackmail from the sinners."
 
"Faith is the worst curse of mankind, as the exact antithesis and enemy of thought."
 
"To rest one's case on faith means to concede that reason is on the side of one's enemies- that one has no rational arguments to offer."
 
"(The Doctrine of Original Sin) declares that (man) ate the fruit of the tree of knowledge - he acquired a mind and became a rational being. It was the knowledge of good and evil - he became a moral being/ He was sentenced to earn his bread by his labor - he became a productive being. He was sentenced to experience desire - he acquired the capacity of sexual enjoyment. The evils for which (the preachers) damn him are reason, morality, creativeness joy - all the cardinal values of his existence."
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 21:56 GMT
????they never taught you about the holocaust or stalin or moa in school??!
 
That's what happens when a school uses "The Flintstones" as its primary history textbook.
 
the christian faith encompassed more communism (not marx's version) then most social democracies have nowadays.

giving away all your possesions any1?
 
Yeah, for some reason Christian conservatives really don't like it when people point that out.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 21:56 GMT
You two faced little punk. No fucking way you run your mouth like this in the open.
 
Only when we encounter batshit-crazy dumbasses like you, Mikey.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 22:12 GMT
Now you are a fucking silver expert after reading 1 post you piece of shit?
 
Wow, looks like the final Mikey-meltdown has begun. This calls for popcorn & beer!
 
What good are you to the world? your are the problem. Lying, sneaking , thieving snake. Being stupid and educated = worthless and dangerous. Maybe we ought to talk about freeing the world of your ilk? Want to fight? Coward! You like using fighting words. You are why tyrants keep but fucking Europe.
 
Stop... please... the laughter... can't... breathe... !!!
 
Ain't won a war yet. We Evil Americans keep saving your worthless asses.
 
Hey Mikey, here's a song you might enjoy:
 
 
 
Muslims will take care of you wimps. hehe I can't wait.
 
How very Christian of you.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 22:19 GMT
You and your ilk are going down genius, the lies won't stand. And when they fall, watch your backs. Cause we will be coming after you folks for a change. We are almost there. That's why you are afraid to admit you are a commie. Commies are the enemy of the people of the world.
 
Riiiiiiight, that doesn't make you sound mentally-unbalanced or just plain psychotic. Not at all.
 
When it's time to fight, you fucks hide like rats from the light.
 
Unlike you, who doesn't have the balls to even respond to 325's challenge to debate via skype.
 
So keep pushing you fuck and maybe we can make a headline. GRR!!!! I wish there were still duels.
 
Okay, I think I'll be printing out and saving copies of these posts.
 
Everyone knows God is real moron. read a little before you go talking you uneducated and stupid egotist.
 
Is that a direct quote from Jesus, or are you just paraphrasing?
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 22:26 GMT
"
Viruses don't develop immunity(that's atheistic), rather, some of the population are already immune, they just are the only ones to survive and take over the population.
 
...are you really such a gigantic idiot that you fail you realize you just described the process of adaptation through natural selection? AKA, the exact same process by which viruses develop immunity (at least according to "atheistic" science and medicine).
 
Sweet merciful crap, how do you even remember to breathe?"
 
ya sci...sometimes i wonder about that aswell...
 
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 22:40 GMT
When you mock those after they affirm a belief and you try to shoot it down, calling the bullshit you fling truth. If the reason that God is believed in is ignorance, then you are the deluded one.
 
...what? As a great man once said:
 
"ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER - DO. YOU. SPEAK. IT?!?!?"
 
I forgot, you guys aren't having kids anymore. Is that because you guys are so smart? Your birth rate dominated by Atheistic society is below 2 now all through europe. Keep calling us morons, when your philosophy's demise is right underneath your know it all noses.
 
Ah, so your fantasy is that the film Idiocracy will become reality.
 
We believers know you need to keep families together and maintain 3 children per family to avoid extinction.
 
Seriously, are you retarded? Don't look now, but (barring some natural disaster or global nuclear exchange) I don't think that h. sapiens is in danger of going extinct any time soon.
 
Why aren't you on the muslim forums?
 
Why would we be? I don't think there are many islamic Kent Hovind supporters.
 
You want to invite some muslim creationists over here, we'll happily debate them as well. It would be hard for them to be any dumber or crazier than the resident Christian creationists.
 
Why you like muslims so much and hate us?
 
Eh? Fundamentalist Christianity and fundamentalist Islam are just different piles of the exact same bullshit.
 
I just want to sock you in the nose for being a disrespectful little punk.
 
Awww, look at the widdle internet tough guy making physical threats from behind a keyboard. Isn't that adorable?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 22:46 GMT
'
When it's time to fight, you fucks hide like rats from the light.
 
Unlike you, who doesn't have the balls to even respond to 325's challenge to debate via skype.
 "
 
well he DID.
he said at first he wouldn't do it,giving first the reason that he didn't use skype and he wanted to talk to someone older. But more recently stating he would be to agressive for a phone conversation.
HOWEVER, he DID ask for what appeared to be a little video back and forth via youtube..which just makes the irony delicious, because if he did skype, WE MIGHT AS WELL TAPE IT AND PUT IN ON YOUTUBE ASWELL, so he'd get his way as would I.
essentially he just wants to be able to rant and then not be held directly accountable when the words leave his mouth. or in other words, he'd looking to let of steam, not converse.
 
 
 
 
 
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 22:49 GMT
"Why would we be? I don't think there are many islamic Kent Hovind supporters."
 
well there are Harun Jayha and he's nearly as bad, but more dishonest.
of course, muslims get on their high horse, rather then making threats of physical violence.
i have yet to recieve one of those from a muslim, and i joined in on the everybody draw mohammed day event. along with posting on their counter FB page.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 22:57 GMT
I am going to piss you guys off.
 
Riiiight. Good luck with that.
 
You guys lose every time you have to fight. napoleon, evil loser. Hitler, evil loser. mussolini, evil loser. one or 2 more and we can think Europe's only great people are evil.
 
Sure, if you're a religiously-motivated zealot who's too ignorant to realize that Europe's history extends beyond the past 200 years.
 
You guys got rid of all the christians in your countries, check the demographics.
 
I can only assume you've never heard of Italy.
 
All Atheists in agreement and you guys are up shits creek with no stupid christians to blame. just all Atheists swearing it's not Atheism that is destroying them.
 
Wow. That argument would need substantial improvement just to reach the level of the post hoc fallacy.
 
You should educate yourself about your evil failed philosophy before insulting a better view of our destiny.
 
And now you're starting to sound like the Emperor from Star Wars.
 
There's really no such thing as "too cliched" for you, is there?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 23:02 GMT
how am i two faced btw?
 
Were I betting man, I'd put good on Mikey not responding (not a very risky, I'll admit).
 
From the looks of it, he's just randomly throwing around terms of derision that he's heard in movies and on TV - without actually understanding what any of them mean. He might as well just use this:
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 23:38 GMT
I was in europe for 2 years.
 
No particular country? Just "Europe"?
 
I could not believe 43 pounds a week is what my friend was living off of.
 
Let me guess: he made the mistake of signing up for your MLM scam?
 
We have no poor here. Our welfare checks are bigger then your paychecks.
 
Are you joking, or have you just never been to rural Georgia or Ohio or Virginia or South/North Carolina, or any part of West Virginia?
 
There are only rich and lazy in america. The poor are far and few between.
 
"Ain't no lion & tiger or no marmot snake,
Just the sweet watermelon and buckwheat cake."
 
That's the way the rest of the song goes, right? Not that you'll get the reference, I'm sure.
 
Happy my butt, you are a miserable Atheist, so mad you come on our sites to vent your happiness.
 
...says the dumbass who has probably singlehandedly made more posts here than myself, 325, and ellman combined - all in the span of a month or two.
 
One thing is for sure time will bare out whether what I said is bat shit.
 
So is that the justitfication you're planning to use the next time you run away?
 
As far as I'm concerned, this scenario has already been played out.
 
Yes, that tends to happen when you repeat the same unsubstantiated BS over and over again - and then dodge like a coward whenever someone challenges you to support your claims.
 
I'm not rich, I don't want to work that hard. I just have what I need and some of what I want. I would have more, but you commies are dragging us down a little, and some people still buy the lie here.
 
Ah, the truth comes out - so the "commies" are a scapegoat for your furstrations and failures.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
3 days - 4,645v
Posted 2010/06/19 - 23:46 GMT
well he DID.
 
Ah, I must have missed that in his recent post frenzy.
 
he said at first he wouldn't do it,giving first the reason that he didn't use skype and he wanted to talk to someone older. But more recently stating he would be to agressive for a phone conversation.
 
Heh, there's a surprise.
 
HOWEVER, he DID ask for what appeared to be a little video back and forth via youtube..
 
That could be entertaining.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/20 - 10:23 GMT
"
I can only assume you've never heard of Italy."
 
or spain...or half of eastern europe
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/25 - 23:58 GMT
I do support medicinal marijuana.
 
5 million + dead from antibiotics. No matter how you spin it, they are fatal at a high rate. If silver was shown to be anywhere near those numbers, 325fraud would have found tremendously more than that lawyerly post.
 
And the Quantum paradox shows us that when you Atheists say everything can be explained naturally, is just hopeful assumptions and insults to suppress other challenge to your BELIEF.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
15 hours - 580v
Posted 2010/06/26 - 1:07 GMT
you know, I don't have to back up what I say, that's your job if you doubt me. Because in the end, It's all who we choose to believe. You believe in Marx and I believe in the God. It doesn't matter how educated or uneducated we are, the truth is the truth. And since you don't know the truth, you can't say what is truth. I believe you have been indoctrinated.
 
Because I believe the people whom I learn from. Christians. You think they are lying snakes. I believe the Bible and prefer to trust those people are telling me the truth before listening to an ends justifies the means atheist. So your teachers are the honest ones? Like when they told you the dna was 98% junk?. Another article popped up on the function of that JUNK dna, they act as decoys for real genes. It was ignorance that was pushed into science to justify the atheistic billions of years. And they ignored it and now we find 40 years later the breakdown in this "junk dna" seems to leave the real pten gene vulnerable. Hmm "ignored junk dna may be where the cure for cancer is. But no funding for that junk dna, no no no. You think those Atheists back then really thought it was junk? They knew it was ignorance, but they couldn't let the bitter truth that they hit the wall. So they make up junk dna to give them the time they need. They think they need to lie to we ignoramuses for our own good. "The ends justifies the means". After all, they know there is no god even if they can't prove it, so lying is ok and not immoral. You have the same mentality that is why I hate atheism it gives you power that you gain from perceived inlightenment so you will remain loyal until it's too late to realize you have been fooled, and are but a useful idiot in the great human struggle to kill God. With no proof. You believe who you want. Are you a liar? I believe what is in the Bible is what jesus said because I think those people were more honest than any Atheist that has ever lived. It's not what you know, it's what you think you know that corrupts you. But at least I see that. But when it comes to Jesus I am a lot closer to who you are then he. 
 
as for the youtube thing. I meant knuckle to bone like in an underground fight. Not a debate. There are dozens of statements I would punch you guys in the jaw for if said to me in real life. all the aggression is coming back to you know it alls, no matter how much you lie and say I was out of line first. I was out of line back and will fight anyone one of you fairly if you want to insist you conboys don't instigate by saying things to people that you would never say if you had to back it up. And if you want to say that about me, then I offer you out and call your bluff. I'm a coward? Now I know you are a liar! 
 
Aren't you?
 
And only commie pawns blame people for their failures. That's how they gain their power. I am a producer and want to live a simple life, I don't want to be bill gates, I just want what i got and not lose it. You are the bitter little human acting like an authority on everything with a quick google search for the talking points you believe and aren't sharp enough to see what they did to you. Don't come on christian sites disrespecting us and the God we believe in and claim we started it all. I will fight for that. will you? Oh you guys don't fight unless you have the numbers to attempt extermination. You folks need to get the Atheists out of power soon or it's over for europe this time round. Watch and see. At least we still have a chance to vote Obama out. I hope. hehe.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/26 - 14:05 GMT
"5 million + dead from antibiotics."
 
ya, and how many people has it saved that silver couldn't?
 
"No matter how you spin it, they are fatal at a high rate."
 
and your statistics are?
 
"If silver was shown to be anywhere near those numbers"
 
colliodal silver isn't even remotely used on the scale of what antibiotics are used at.
 
"And the Quantum paradox shows us that when you Atheists say everything can be explained naturally,"
 
and here comes the paradox again. we've alreayd adressed this...a long time ago...
 
"than that lawyerly post."
 
an abstract froma an scientific article, is NOT a lawyerly post.
we don't have the statistics to say that it's deadly or effective, but we do have in vitro tests which demonstrate it's effectiveness, or lack thereof.
and we know what happens with metal poisoning in (human) cells, and evolving resistance to silver in microbes.


one paragraph is particularly crushing for proponents of continieus inake fo colloidal silver.
 
"What is needed for research? With the availability of the genes for silver resistance, we have identified closely related genes in bacteria from environmental and clinical environments and from diverse geographical locations (A. Gupta et al., in preparation). These findings should eliminate recent skepticism about the existence of silver-resistant bacteria. Now that the means for identifying silver resistance determinants in Enterobacteriaceae is available, similar efforts are needed with other common pathogens on large burns (specifically Pseudomonads and Staphylococci). The wide and uncontrolled use of silver products may result in more bacteria developing resistance, analogous to the world-wide emergence of antibiotic- and other biocide-resistant bacteria [36,37]. Such resistant microbes would be detrimental to clinical and hygienic uses that depend on the microcidal properties of silver."
 
have a nice read.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2010/06/26 - 14:43 GMT
"you know, I don't have to back up what I say, that's your job if you doubt me."
 
NO.
if you make a claim, YOU have to back it up with evidence.
that's the way it works in the real world.
 
"You think they are lying snakes."
 
NO, we do not make that generelisation. that we can demonstrate that most fundementalist preachers adn all creationists are willfully ignorant and increadibly intellectually dishonest, does NOT make all the catholics, or baptists or protestats "lying snakes".
 
"So your teachers are the honest ones?"
 
well my professors are actively engaged in research...and what use is there in lying if peer review will crush you?
 
"Like when they told you the dna was 98% junk?"
 
and that that "junk" has important functions? and that those functions where already given in the very paper THAT COINED THE TERM.
 
"Another article popped up on the function of that JUNK dna, they act as decoys for real genes."
 
stop your strawman, the term junk DNA doesn't describe it as being useless, just non coding.
"
Junk DNA

Junk DNA, a term that was introduced in 1972 by Susumu Ohno,[25] was a provisional label for the portions of a genome sequence for which no discernible function had been identified. According to a 1980 review in Nature by Leslie Orgel and Francis Crick, junk DNA has "little specificity and conveys little or no selective advantage to the organism".[26] The term is currently, however, a somewhat outdated concept, being used mainly in popular science and in a colloquial way in scientific publications, and may have slowed research into the biological functions of noncoding DNA.[27] Several lines of evidence indicate that many "junk DNA" sequences have likely but unidentified functional activity, and other sequences may have had functions in the past.[28]

Still, a large amount of sequence in these genomes falls under no existing classification other than "junk". For example, one experiment removed 1% of the mouse genome with no detectable effect on the phenotype.[29] This result suggests that the removed DNA was largely nonfunctional. In addition, these sequences are enriched for the heterochromatic histone modification H3K9me3 [30]."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noncoding_DNA#Junk_DNA

and the term isn't even really used in science. it was indeed a misnomer from the beginning. go look at pubmed. only 104! references with the term "junk DNA".

and then it's even used as a colloquial term.

you've been arguing against a strawman from the beginning mikey.

"But no funding for that junk dna, no no no."

you mind backing up that statement? because quite a bit of research has already been done on how all that non coding DNA is relevent for the mechanics of the cell.

"hey think they need to lie to we ignoramuses for our own good. "The ends justifies the means". After all, they know there is no god even if they can't prove it, so lying is ok and not immoral. You have the same mentality that is why I hate atheism it gives you power that you gain from perceived inlightenment so you will remain loyal until it's too late to realize you have been fooled, and are but a useful idiot in the great human struggle to kill God. With no proof. You believe who you want. Are you a liar? I believe what is in the Bible is what jesus said because I think those people were more honest than any Atheist that has ever lived. It's not what you know, it's what you think you know that corrupts you. But at least I see that. But when it comes to Jesus I am a lot closer to who you are then he. "

and more barely consistant ranting.

"as for the youtube thing. I meant knuckle to bone like in an underground fight. Not a debate. There are dozens of statements I would punch you guys in the jaw for if said to me in real life."

violence is not a form of argument.

"by saying things to people that you would never say if you had to back it up."

and yet I do try to back it up, even when i say it here.

"I'm a coward? Now I know you are a liar! "

you are a coward because you resort to petty threats instead of taking part in an easily arrangable civil discussion. Why does that make you a coward? because you think that if you smash my mouth in, all the arguments i amke will magically "go away".

"You are the bitter little human acting like an authority on everything with a quick google search"

having a better understanding of certain things then you does not make me a "bitter little human acting like an authority". it just makes you sound ignorant in respect to the things i know more about.

"Don't come on christian sites disrespecting us"

no, you don't get to keep your little E-echochamber. because this is the kind of BS that needs to be adresses at every point it tries to spread itself.


"Oh you guys don't fight unless you have the numbers to attempt extermination. You folks need to get the Atheists out of power soon or it's over for europe this time round. Watch and see. At least we still have a chance to vote Obama out. I hope. hehe."

ya....that "hehe" really makes you sound serious when handling such strong statements.

» Reply to Comment
Re: Responding to mwolf
9 hours - 765v
Posted 2010/06/28 - 21:57 GMT
I would like to make sweet, sweet love to some junk DNA

» Reply to Discussion (Too Many Replies for Fancy Display) 160 Replies

GenTime: 0.0559 seconds

Site Design and Graphics Copyright 2002 - 2021 by Aubrey
Use of this site constitutes agreement to our » Legal Stuff