The recent discussion of Kent Hovind's sanity (or lack thereof?) reminded me of
an essay on Narcissistic Personality Disorder written by Paul Lutus. The essay doesn't mention Creationism in particular, but many of the general characteristics are perfect descriptions of Kent Hovind (and creationists in general).
This is especially true for the section of the essay that focuses on Postmodernism & New Age thinking - not surprising, as New Age nutters and Creationists are essentially just "same bullshit, different pile."
A few choice quotes:
"New Age believers proclaim their independence from the boring,
excessively strict ideas of their forebears, their fixation on evidence,
their silly assertion that effects arise from causes for other than
magical reasons, and the idea that science is a legitimate way to
evaluate reality. Such silly, old-fashioned ideas."
"Most
New Age believers are too poorly educated to recognize what they
are giving up along with intellectual rigor."
"Another
litmus test for narcissism is pathological lying, but by
adopting a postmodernist outlook, the narcissist can rationalize lying
on the ground that there aren't any real truths anyway."
"But
there is a sad fact at the core of narcissists' personalities, one
that explains their preference for lies over truth. It is that the most
absurd falsehood they might craft is more attractive overall than any
truth about themselves or their circumstances. A narcissist's life is a
beauty contest where a dark pond's false reflection struggles against
daylight's ugly truth."
Replace "Narcisist" or "New Age believer" with "creationist," and all of those quotes would make accurate descriptions of Hovind and his followers.