I was wondering about the mechanisms for evolution. Even though no evoultion has taken place in the past 6,000 years, it claims to hide behind billions and billions of years. There are aspects of the theory of evolution that must be consistant if the theory of evolution is even feesible. So, I devised a list of questions that put the theory of evolution in the right perspective.

 

What would the theory of evolution look like if the earth was only 6,000 years old?

 

Since the beginning of time, nothing has "evolved" into another kind of animal. Conclusion, the earth cannot be young if evolution is to not look stupid.

 

What proof is there of evolution?

 

The main construct of the evolution idea is in the fossils (since it miraculousy lacks any observational medium).  But as we have already discovered radiometric dating is the furthest thing from reliable and finding 'bones in the dirt' do not constitute any evolutionary discoveries. I'll explain.

 

Bones in dirt + years of erosion, weathering and damage + other bone diseases + intentional tampering and misrepresentation = an unconvincing case for evolution

 

Oddly enough, becomes more than convincing for someone who craves evolution to be true.

 

What would evolution look like if life did not exist on other planets?

 

Hmmm... life hasn't been found on any other planet.