Home > FreeHovind > Content > Creation and Evolution > Discussion: Evolutionism in a nutshell
Evolutionism in a nutshell
11 Comments - 26877 Views
Submitted By 9tails on 09/05/20
FreeHovind, 9tails, Creation and Evolution 
This Discussion originally posted in the "FreeHovind" Group

The favorite verse, really sums up the arrogance of the evolutionist.
 

II Peter 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
 
3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
 
3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water.

» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2009/05/20 - 14:11 GMT
ehm, what has that to do with evolutionism?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2009/05/20 - 16:23 GMT
what's this?
some one posting a summery of something he doesn't understand?
it appear so.
 
"For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water."
 
i cannot even understand the phrasing of the second part?
should you at least link some more context, instead of just quoting it ofr the "willingly ignorant" part?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2009/05/20 - 16:37 GMT
You know a great idea here? we could quotemine kent hovind to death! :D
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
2 days - 3,026v
Posted 2009/05/20 - 16:38 GMT
It is a holy scripture that states that a community of scoffers will come, being willingly ignorant (that means dumb on purpose) of the creation and of the cataclysmic flood of Noah.
 
What does that have to do with Evolution?
 
The dangerous sect Evolutionism is founded on the uniformitarian concept. Denying the flood is essential for the idea to thrive, why?
 
If the earth is subject to a global flood, where in 1 family escapes, that means ..... ? You guessed it, that humanity has been judged, can be judged and will be judged again.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2009/05/20 - 17:03 GMT
"Denying the flood is essential for the idea to thrive, why?"
 
denying somehting which never happend as it was written in the book....
wierd....
this is just another "god hating atheists/theists" statement.
 
"If the earth is subject to a global flood, where in 1 family escapes, that means ..... ? You guessed it, that humanity has been judged, can be judged and will be judged again."
 
and if that had happened we'd be much more inbred then we were now.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2009/05/20 - 17:04 GMT
"It is a holy scripture that states that a community of scoffers will come, being willingly ignorant (that means dumb on purpose) of the creation and of the cataclysmic flood of Noah."
- So? the Odyssey hold as much truth as the bible. Do you really think that zeus spoke to athena and told her to watch over Odysseys?
Thinking we want to be dumb on purpose is such an oxymoron.

"The dangerous sect Evolutionism is founded on the uniformitarian concept. Denying the flood is essential for the idea to thrive, why?"
- Ehm, if you haven't noticed christianity is a sect in so many forms. Holy shit you are so stupid. IT IS NOT FOUNDED ON UNIFORMITARIAN CONCEPT!!! how the hell could it be? FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME WE DIDN'T MAKE IT UP BECAUSE WE DIDN'T BELIEVE IN GOD! THE EVIDENCE FROM THE NATURE AND SCIENCE MADE US COME TO THAT CONCLUSION! FFS how stupid can you be? Why do you even try and fail so miserably to describe evolution. Look in the fucking dictionary! Why should we accept an event that there is no evidence for ever happening? We deny it because there is no evidence you moron! Is that so hard for your little brain to understand? huh?

"If the earth is subject to a global flood, where in 1 family escapes, that means ..... ? You guessed it, that humanity has been judged, can be judged and will be judged again."
- Again you accept that the bible is completely 100 % true. There could not have been a flood because the idea of 1 family doing that is so moronic it's unbelievable. There are over 1 million different land living species and if there would be 2 of each kind that would be so much animals so no one can handle. There's a quote from a zoologist saying "If Noah actually did make it work he'd have to be the best animal trainer in the history of man". You can't feed them all, you cannot control them, you cannot gather them on a boat that is have to be that size of the island of manhattan. It's simply IMPOSSIBLE!

If you actually believe in the flood and that the bible is 100% correct than you're a bigger douche than Kent Hovind and not to mention, you would have been dropped in the floor by your parents when you where little and skipped high school or any good education at all.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2009/05/20 - 17:13 GMT
quote from Dr Alex Ritchie. It's about the "leading" "geologist" on the ICR and his "research".
Dr Alex Ritchie received his BSc. (Hons) in Geology and a Ph.D at the University of Edinburgh.  He worked as a palaeontologist at the Australian Museum from 1968 to 1995 where he is currently a Research Fellow.


"Several years ago, in the Sydney Morning Herald, as one geologist to another, I publicly challenged Dr Snelling (the young-earth creationist version) to a public debate, before our geological peers, on a subject close to his heart - Noah's Flood - The Geological Case For and Against.

I've repeated the challenge several times since then and it still stands.

For reasons best known only to himself, Dr Snelling has declined to defend the creationist cause.

In the light of the above I suggest the reason is obvious. In his heart, and as a trained geologist, he knows that the young-earth model is a load of old codswallop and is totally indefensible."

source: http://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/realsnelling.htm


If there's proof of the flood, why doesn't he talk to the peer?
= there's non

» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
2 days - 3,026v
Posted 2009/05/22 - 23:57 GMT
The only thing I find impossible is that we share a common ancestry with all life.
 
Feel free to continue to be belligerent, close minded and critical, you only help to further prove my point.
 
The main reason you people are dangerous is because you hold your belief sacred, you are hostile against anyone who believes differently. It's like saying, "The sky used to be brown". Someone says, "I disagree, I haven't seen anything that should lead me to believe that" and you get pissed and start flinging fieces. Don't be a jackass to everyone that disagrees with you. You will offend a lot of people that way.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2009/05/23 - 1:59 GMT
Yes, well i wouldn't be here if you guys weren't spreading bullshit about a subject i work with for a living and that you don't know shit about. It's like if i would say that there is no other plantes because i haven't seen anyone and i didn't bother looking in a telescope or even TRY TOO LEARN anything about it. You claims are utter bs and you would do the world a big favore if you just stopped spreading bs. Thanx!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
5 days - 8,142v
Posted 2009/05/23 - 8:07 GMT
"
The only thing I find impossible is that we share a common ancestry with all life.
 "
 
DNA HOMOLOGY
 
"Feel free to continue to be belligerent, close minded and critical, you only help to further prove my point."
 
what's wrong with being critical? critical thinking should be somethign that is nurtured and stimulated. NO MORE DOGMATIC ACCEPANCE.
 
but then again. you hypocracy will not allow you to see who is the more closeminded of us two..
 
"The main reason you people are dangerous is because you hold your belief sacred, you are hostile against anyone who believes differently. It's like saying, "The sky used to be brown". Someone says, "I disagree, I haven't seen anything that should lead me to believe that" and you get pissed and start flinging fieces."
 
GJ at describing the "goddunnit" people.
 
"Don't be a jackass to everyone that disagrees with you. You will offend a lot of people that way."
hahahah riiiight i am a jackass because they don't agree with me.
NO!
 
im a jackass because people DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY ARE ARGUING AGAINST AND WILL NOT LEARN THE CORRECT TERMS.
i ama  jackass because every argument they put forth is stale, chewed out and debunked. and STILL you keep repeatign it.
 
i am a jackass because i hate ignorant hypocrits.
 
» Reply to Comment
Re: Evolutionism in a nutshell
2 days - 2,415v
Posted 2009/05/23 - 12:20 GMT
don't forget because they use and abuse strawmen.


GenTime: 0.0301 seconds

Site Design and Graphics Copyright 2002 - 2021 by Aubrey
Use of this site constitutes agreement to our » Legal Stuff