Home > Carbon Combat > Content > Document: Yet another poll...
Yet another poll...
28 Comments - 60744 Views
...but for weapons!
Submitted By CavComm on 12/01/31
Carbon Combat, CavComm, Documents 
This Document originally posted in the "Carbon Combat" Group

Hey all, Temp here. Apophis made the poll for a "Add Item" item in the Carbon Combat shop. That poll closed yesterday. Now you have a new poll to vote on! For a "Add Weapon" Item. Yeah, I suggested having a third weapons slot before, but now to be fair, it costs credits, instead of being automatic.
When this poll is closed (In 15 days) it will be a different poll for a "Add Bodykit" item which me, eric and lucy all said it should be done. The reason I'm waiting till this poll is closed is so I'm not hogging the forums with three different posts for polls at the same time. Also, if a Mod/ Admin  should be posting this instead of me I will resolve this. If the embed or imbed link doesn't work, click here
Cost: 25,000 Credits

» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
3 days - 13,589v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 20:11 GMT
May I Suggest using micropolls?  I already have an account on there so I will be happy to make one for you or anyone else.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 20:28 GMT
I don't know what that is...
And whats up with the dialouge box that keeps poping up?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
1 day - 5,354v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 20:55 GMT
Three weapons are overpowered and takes away skill needed. One weapon isn't fun because there would be only one way to kill (excluding items, power ups and other stuff like the ramming blade).
Two weapons are perfect. Besides, the weapon power ups are there for that reason.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 21:02 GMT
Who flagged the comments??? -__-
Not cool
And three weapons maybe overpowered... thats why its should cost 20,000 credits....
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
1 day - 5,354v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 21:09 GMT
With time, they will get it. I've heard that Nattyfranky has surplus of over 16K. Once people get it, they can get 20K in like mere days (or weeks).
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 21:14 GMT
Suffercor would get it first... he's got over 1 mill... :O
I'll raise it to 25K?...
0_o
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
1 day - 5,354v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 21:21 GMT
Nah, as I said, with such an item playes would get so much creds and kills, to simply put it, too overpowering. How about 999 Million? That way only a hacker (or a person that really has no life (or CT as a guest or other random player)) can get it. Or we can just not put the item in the game.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
3 days - 13,589v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 22:15 GMT
Cav, as a mod I see no removed or flagged comments.  Also, it will not take long for someone to earn that many credits.  If a car is maxed and a player is good, then 700 credits is usually a minimum.  So just divide 25000 by 700 and then that amount by 10 to see how many games it would take for a person to gain that extra slot.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/01/31 - 23:11 GMT
I've got a big surplus. I could buy that and get an edge.
 
But I am against that.
 
1 weapon = spray and pray, shoot everything in sight, boring.
 
2 weapons = strategy, combinations, adaptation to circumstances.
 
3 weapons = overkill, less skill needed, easier to adapt, no skill necessary.
 
2 is perfect.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/02/01 - 2:57 GMT
I changed the price to 50,000... 0_o
I'm not going past 75,000... 0_<
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
2 days - 6,069v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 1:44 GMT
CavComm (or Temp, if you prefer...),
 
I have done the math. For a skilled player to get the weapon at a cost of 25,000 credits, and assuming that they earn 700 credits per game would take exactly 36 games. With the increase in cost you are proposing, it  would take 72 games. Just to put this in perspective (and for a LOL), here is what that would look like:
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=72. Do YOU want to play that many games just to get one weapon? I, personally, think that the price should stay at 25,000 credits, because it is quite possible to attain, for most players.
 
Sincerely,
[Mod] Apophis
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 2:04 GMT
I lowered the price back to 25,000 Credits...
Should i make a poll about a 100,000 - 150,000 credit CC nuke?
Stats:
Ammo: 1
Use per round: 1
Damage: Immediate death for all members of the opposing team.
Description: A powerful nuke that will wipe out all members of the opposite team. A Flying Fortress Bomber will fly onto the battlefield and drop it.
Range: 30 Feet- full battlefield range... If your not wearing the soon-to-be proposed "Hazmat Bodykit", (Which protects you from radiation) You will gradually lose health... (This effect only last for two minutes, after that time you won't lose health that way)
Limitations: If used, you will not receive a instant kill streak. Only counts as one kill.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 22,986v
Posted 2012/02/01 - 14:35 GMT
Is it me or ddid the price of the laser cannon go up?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 22,986v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 2:17 GMT
What happened? Credits are 10x easier to get! I remember in the old days when 1000 coins was a week's worth on work….
I VOTE NO!
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
3 days - 13,589v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 2:22 GMT
I have done a small comparison...  Befor the new credit sustem (10 credits per kill, no multiplyer cap (or even a 5x cap)) it took a 20 kill streak to reach the 700 credit cap.  Now with the 20 credits per kill and the 50 credit first kill bonus, it takes around 25 kill streak.  None of these take into effect the extra credits earned at the end of the round.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 2:31 GMT
@Nattyfrank: I don't see your point...
@PocketMAD: You would disagree with me on anything...
@Anyone: What about the nuke stat's?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 3:51 GMT
Nukes are overkill. There is a reason why only 2 have been used in the history of warfare.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
3 days - 13,589v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 3:57 GMT
About that...  the incinderary bombing campaign was more devastating then the nukes were.  Just throwing that out there.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 4:06 GMT
Koopa... Its just a game... -_-
Thats why its so expensive... only suffercoer could get it...
Look at the stats... -__-
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 23:19 GMT
Actually, I have around a 46k stash. I could get that.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/02/03 - 0:34 GMT
Yeah... only you and three other people... -__-
Not many people would have it...
*crickets*
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/02/16 - 3:11 GMT
Yeah!
The votes say yes!!!! Yippe Ki Yay!
I'll go PM CarbonTech now...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 4:22 GMT
I believe having two weapons is reasonable as is. It seems a few of you want to have everything valuable at your fingertips :P Having three available weapons may compromise skill needed in a game.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 4:32 GMT
Which would you rather have?: Three weapons or a nuke?
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 22,986v
Posted 2012/02/02 - 4:41 GMT
Temp, I disagree with you a lot because we disagree a lot. However, time to time, we actually agree with one another.
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
41 minutes - 140v
Posted 2012/02/16 - 3:32 GMT
could you make it around 10,000 instead? :D
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
5 days - 12,389v
Posted 2012/02/16 - 3:53 GMT
Nope... Too cheap...
» Reply to Comment
Re: Yet another poll...
1 week - 32,767v
Posted 2012/02/17 - 1:06 GMT
Answer to poll: No.


GenTime: 0.0353 seconds

Site Design and Graphics Copyright 2002 - 2021 by Aubrey
Use of this site constitutes agreement to our » Legal Stuff